SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
![Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl -t N register ??](http://unixadmintalk.com/iconimages/f47/re-hackers-pg_ctl-t-n-register_ltr.gif)
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-19-2008, 06:23 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl -t N register ?? Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a > > > -t parameter. This does not seem to make sense to me. Is it correct? > > > Does it do anything? > > > > > > My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis. > > > > Well, Peter added it, but register already had the -w parameter, so > > either register needs both -t and -w, or it needs neither of them. I > > don't know which is true. > > Humm, in pgwin32_CommandLine I don't see any reference to -t but -w is > there. So either > > a) the bug is that somebody forgot to add -t to pgwin32_CommandLine > b) the bug is that -t was added to the synopsis, or > c) I'm full of it because of an untold reason. Yes, the bug was "a" and I am responsible. I didn't realize pg_ctl register stores all its arguments. Patch attached and applied. The SGML documentation is now accurate. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings      |
 |
« MI5 Persecution: Faxes Sent to Media1 (6309)
|
Re: [BUGS] BUG #3770: Follow up: Fail to make bcc32.mak forlibpq »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 PM.
