SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-18-2008, 10:30 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: HOT patch - version 14 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I see that you have a separate bitmapset to keep track of indexes on > system attributes. But having an index on a system attribute doesn't > make any sense, does it? Counterexample: OID. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly      |
|
04-18-2008, 10:31 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: HOT patch - version 14 On 8/20/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > I see that you have a separate bitmapset to keep track of indexes on > > system attributes. But having an index on a system attribute doesn't > > make any sense, does it? > > Counterexample: OID. > > > Right. Further, we allow creating indexes on system attributes. So we must support those. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com |
 |
« MI5 Persecution: Striking out action 10/3/97 (12115)
|
MI5 Persecution: I am being ignored 17/4/97 (13338) »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.
