SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-19-2008, 06:27 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: Ordered Append WIP patch v1 Gregory Stark wrote: > > Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append > nodes. Did you ever publish an updated version of this patch? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches      |
|
04-19-2008, 06:27 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Ordered Append WIP patch v1 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Gregory Stark wrote: > > > > Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append > > nodes. > > Did you ever publish an updated version of this patch? I don't think so. I think we just need to tell Greg if he should continue in this direction. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches |
|
04-19-2008, 06:27 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Ordered Append WIP patch v1 "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Gregory Stark wrote: >> > >> > Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append >> > nodes. >> >> Did you ever publish an updated version of this patch? No, it's been kind of on the back burner. > I don't think so. I think we just need to tell Greg if he should > continue in this direction. I think the executor side of things is pretty straightforward. Where I'm really uncertain is on the planner side of things. To be honest I didn't follow at all what Tom was saying to do with the equivalence classes. What it's doing now is basically just lying and saying the child columns are equivalent to the parent columns -- I'm not sure what the consequences of that are. Tom seemed to think that would be bad but I don't see any real problems with it. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support! -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches |
Linear Mode
