Unix Technical Forum

Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and

This is a discussion on Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and within the Pgsql Patches forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the > documentation and ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql Patches

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:11 AM
Joshua D. Drake
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [HACKERS] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and


> The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the
> documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed yet). Given this
> patch came from userland, istm people are comfortable enough with this
> terminology there is no need to change it.


+1

>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:12 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [HACKERS] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the
> > documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> > dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> > vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed yet). Given this
> > patch came from userland, istm people are comfortable enough with this
> > terminology there is no need to change it.

>
> +1


OK. I will adjust any places that still use expired, and put the patch
into the queue.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com