vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| "Sergey E. Koposov" <math@sai.msu.ru> writes: > The problem with that is in fact in pl_exec.c in function > compatible_tupdesc(), which do not check for the deleted attributes. Is that really the only problem? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| |||
| On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > "Sergey E. Koposov" <math@sai.msu.ru> writes: > > The problem with that is in fact in pl_exec.c in function > > compatible_tupdesc(), which do not check for the deleted attributes. > > Is that really the only problem? I cannot be completely sure in that, but at least the submitted patch eliminate the problem with the SQL code from my previous email. Regards, Sergey ************************************************** *** Sergey E. Koposov Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math E-mail: math@sai.msu.ru ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| ||||
| On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > "Sergey E. Koposov" <math@sai.msu.ru> writes: > > The problem with that is in fact in pl_exec.c in function > > compatible_tupdesc(), which do not check for the deleted attributes. > > Is that really the only problem? Tom, Are there any problems with that patch to not be applied ? (Sorry if I'm hurrying) Regards, Sergey ************************************************** *** Sergey E. Koposov Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math E-mail: math@sai.msu.ru ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |