SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
05-02-2008, 05:07 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version Hello 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello >> >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler. >> > > you really compile this one? i get a complain because > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only > 7.. yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb...8;r2=1.109;f=h Pavel .. > > + expr = read_sql_construct(',', K_THEN, 0, "THEN", > + "SELECT ", true, true, &tok); > > > gram.y: In function 'plpgsql_yyparse': > gram.y:1697: warning: passing argument 5 of 'read_sql_construct' makes > integer from pointer without a cast > gram.y:1697: warning: passing argument 7 of 'read_sql_construct' makes > pointer from integer without a cast > gram.y:1697: error: too many arguments to function 'read_sql_construct' > > -- > regards, > Jaime Casanova > Soporte de PostgreSQL > Guayaquil - Ecuador > Cel. (593) 087171157 > -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches      |
|
05-02-2008, 05:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>: > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own > >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler. > >> > > > > you really compile this one? i get a complain because > > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only > > 7.. > > yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch > http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb...8;r2=1.109;f=h > so, i need to see that patch first? patch that doesn't apply because of changes in files (specially definitions moved to other files, but i haven't checked all the .rej yet) -- regards, Jaime Casanova Soporte de PostgreSQL Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 087171157 -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches |
|
05-02-2008, 05:07 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello > > > > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>: > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hello > > >> > > >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own > > >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler. > > >> > > > > > > you really compile this one? i get a complain because > > > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only > > > 7.. > > > > yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch > > http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb...8;r2=1.109;f=h > > > > so, i need to see that patch first? patch that doesn't apply because > of changes in files (specially definitions moved to other files, but i > haven't checked all the .rej yet) > sorry, you mean already applied RETURN QUERY, right? i was thinking in pending patch RETURN QUERY EXECUTE... i will check again my files but i'm sure i have updated tu CVS TIP before try your patch -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte de PostgreSQL Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 087171157 -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches |
|
05-02-2008, 05:07 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>: > > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello > > > >> > > > >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own > > > >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler. > > > >> > > > > > > > > you really compile this one? i get a complain because > > > > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only > > > > 7.. > > > > > > yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch > > > http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb...8;r2=1.109;f=h > > > > > > > so, i need to see that patch first? patch that doesn't apply because > > of changes in files (specially definitions moved to other files, but i > > haven't checked all the .rej yet) > > > > sorry, you mean already applied RETURN QUERY, right? i was thinking in > pending patch RETURN QUERY EXECUTE... i will check again my files but > i'm sure i have updated tu CVS TIP before try your patch > ok, you're right... sorry for the noise... i will try it again -- regards, Jaime Casanova Soporte de PostgreSQL Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. (593) 087171157 -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches |
 |
« Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
|
Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 PM.
