vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes > into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done > is ... > Comments? Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress would be more visible? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| |||
| Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress > would be more visible? 140K patches don't belong on -hackers ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| ||||
| On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes > > into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from > > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done > > is ... > > > Comments? > > Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress > would be more visible? I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|