Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql Patches

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default SGML index build fix

The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SGML index build fix

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.


This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.

I just got done reading an interesting comparison of MS Vista versus
Mac OS X:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/...leID=196800670
The guy's very first complaint about Vista is how it demands your
attention constantly with trivial warning messages. This seems in much
the same vein.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SGML index build fix

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.

>
> This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
> up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.


I certainly did not, and it warns only when an invalid HTML.index is
used.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.

> >
> > This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
> > up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> > to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> > Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.

>
> I certainly did not, and it warns only when an invalid HTML.index is
> used.


And the people creating our PDFs didn't know because we often have to
update the web site with valid ones that have indexes.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Joshua D. Drake
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.

>
> This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
> up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.


No, not everyone knows. In fact I would argue that most do not know. It
isn't intuitive to the process. You *expect* that an index will be made.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.

> >
> > This is just useless noise. If it could tell the difference between an
> > up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> > to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> > Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.

>
> No, not everyone knows. In fact I would argue that most do not know. It
> isn't intuitive to the process. You *expect* that an index will be made.


The idea for the warning message actually came from Peter.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Peter Eisentraut
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SGML index build fix

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.


> ! # for some reason $wildcard expands too early, so we use 'test'


$wildcard is expanded whenever you tell it to. What did you write?

> ! @test -f bookindex.valid || echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"


The proper command to run is $(MAKE).

> !


There is a redundant tab on that line.

> + @test -f bookindex.valid || echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"


Probably better to capture that in a variable instead of copying it half a dozen times.

> -e '1a\' -e '<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd">' \
> >$@
> # ' hello Emacs
> + @test -f bookindex.valid || echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"


When converting to XML, you probably don't want an index because it will
be built differently by the XSLT toolchain. It's not clear what we want
anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Martijn van Oosterhout
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:42:06AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.

> >
> > No, not everyone knows. In fact I would argue that most do not know. It
> > isn't intuitive to the process. You *expect* that an index will be made.

>
> The idea for the warning message actually came from Peter.


FWIW, I have this problem with LaTeX also, which needs multiple passes
occasionally to fix cross-references and idexes and stuff. The solution
I have in the makefile is a fragment like the following:

while egrep -q "^LaTeX Warning:.*Rerun to" logfile ; do
rm logfile
latex taxfile
done

I don't know enough about the relevent tool to know if they actually
generate a warning about whether they need to be rerun. In any case it
seems a much better approach to simply run it again when needed rather
than printing a warning.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFoNf4IB7bNG8LQkwRAlCaAJ9lmu335kb96EWNXWYptG qjO0XmvQCbBAmJ
WmuXTe46XEBCdRHcZdTuN7E=
=rkQP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:15 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SGML index build fix

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.

>
> > ! # for some reason $wildcard expands too early, so we use 'test'

>
> $wildcard is expanded whenever you tell it to. What did you write?


I wrote:

ifeq (,$(wildcard bookindex.valid))
echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"
endif

but that warns on the first _two_ runs, meaning it expanded at the time
the rule started, not at the time it hit that line.

> > ! @test -f bookindex.valid || echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"

>
> The proper command to run is $(MAKE).


OK, updated.

>
> > !

>
> There is a redundant tab on that line.


OK, removed.

>
> > + @test -f bookindex.valid || echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"

>
> Probably better to capture that in a variable instead of copying it half a dozen times.
>
> > -e '1a\' -e '<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd">' \
> > >$@
> > # ' hello Emacs
> > + @test -f bookindex.valid || echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"

>
> When converting to XML, you probably don't want an index because it will
> be built differently by the XSLT toolchain. It's not clear what we want
> anyway.


OK, removed.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:16 AM
Peter Eisentraut
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SGML index build fix

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> ifeq (,$(wildcard bookindex.valid))
> echo "Run 'gmake' again to generate output with a proper index"
> endif
>
> but that warns on the first _two_ runs, meaning it expanded at the
> time the rule started, not at the time it hit that line.


This expands at the time the makefile is read. You may get it to work
with

target:
$(if $(wildcard blah), this, that)

The following may be helpful:
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/man...ding-Makefiles

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650