This is a discussion on Win32 BYTE_ORDER within the Pgsql Patches forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> This patch adds a #define for BYTE_ORDER to win32.h if it's not pulled in elsewhere, as needed by msvc ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| This patch adds a #define for BYTE_ORDER to win32.h if it's not pulled in elsewhere, as needed by msvc build of pgcrypto. Seems several other platforms define it in their port file already, but not win32. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > This patch adds a #define for BYTE_ORDER to win32.h if it's not pulled > in elsewhere, as needed by msvc build of pgcrypto. Seems several other > platforms define it in their port file already, but not win32. Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and friends .... it seems unlikely that a platform would provide those and then forget BYTE_ORDER. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| > > This patch adds a #define for BYTE_ORDER to win32.h if it's > not pulled > > in elsewhere, as needed by msvc build of pgcrypto. Seems > several other > > platforms define it in their port file already, but not win32. > > Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and > friends ... it seems unlikely that a platform would provide > those and then forget BYTE_ORDER. Well, it compiled just fine, so it must've found it somewhere :-) //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| ||||
| "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: >> Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and >> friends ... it seems unlikely that a platform would provide >> those and then forget BYTE_ORDER. > Well, it compiled just fine, so it must've found it somewhere :-) I think the #if tests probably reduced to 0 == 0 ... so my bet is it compiled but didn't work. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |