vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm testing the new asynch commit feature on various raid configurations and my early findings is that it reduces the impact of keeping wal and data on the same volume. I have 10 disks to play with, and am finding that it's faster to do a 10 drive raid 10 rather than 8 drive raid 10 + two drive wal. anybody curious about the results, feel free to drop a line. I think this will be a popular feature. merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| |||
| On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:09:00AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > I'm testing the new asynch commit feature on various raid > configurations and my early findings is that it reduces the impact of > keeping wal and data on the same volume. I have 10 disks to play > with, and am finding that it's faster to do a 10 drive raid 10 rather > than 8 drive raid 10 + two drive wal. > > anybody curious about the results, feel free to drop a line. I think > this will be a popular feature. With or without a write cache on the RAID controller? I suspect that for many systems, a write-caching controller will be very similar in performance to async commit. -- Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFG0y/6dO30qud8SkgRAu/rAKDlcKJSSLrXcve/8OALmyK4dpfnWwCcDiN2 bsmVEwZtjgq7PWJF601CpF8= =RXHQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| ||||
| On 8/27/07, Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:09:00AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > I'm testing the new asynch commit feature on various raid > > configurations and my early findings is that it reduces the impact of > > keeping wal and data on the same volume. I have 10 disks to play > > with, and am finding that it's faster to do a 10 drive raid 10 rather > > than 8 drive raid 10 + two drive wal. > > > > anybody curious about the results, feel free to drop a line. I think > > this will be a popular feature. > > With or without a write cache on the RAID controller? I suspect that for > many systems, a write-caching controller will be very similar in > performance to async commit. I usually only work with mid to high end hardware. The platform I'm testing on is: 10x146gb 15k rpm sas in Dell md1000 2xperc 5/e in active/active (5 drives each controller) 2x146gb 15krpm sas on the backplane perc 5/i (for o/s, wal) in my experience, even with a high end raid controller moving the wal offline is helpful in high activity systems, especially during checkpoints. merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|