This is a discussion on Re: insert performance for win32 within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > > "Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes: > > yeah. I'm guessing problem is in the mingw flex/bison (which I ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > > "Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes: > > yeah. I'm guessing problem is in the mingw flex/bison (which I really, > > really hope is not the case) or some other win32 specific block of code. > > I'm snooping around there... > > Maybe I'm confused here, but I thought we had established that the local > and remote cases behave differently for you? If so I'd suppose that it > must be a networking issue, and there's little point in looking inside > psql. > The local case is *worse*...presumably because psql is competing with the server for cpu time...cpu load is pegged at 100%. On the remote case, I'm getting 50-60% cpu load which is way to high. The problem is definitely in psql. Merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |