This is a discussion on Re: opinion on disk speed within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto gsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Vivek Khera > Sent: 08 December ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto > Vivek Khera > Sent: 08 December 2005 16:52 > To: Postgresql Performance > Subject: [PERFORM] opinion on disk speed > > I have a choice to make on a RAID enclosure: > > 14x 36GB 15kRPM ultra 320 SCSI drives > > OR > > 12x 72GB 10kRPM ultra 320 SCSI drives > > both would be configured into RAID 10 over two SCSI channels using a > megaraid 320-2x card. > > My goal is speed. Either would provide more disk space than I would > need over the next two years. > > The database does a good number of write transactions, and a decent > number of sequential scans over the whole DB (about 60GB including > indexes) for large reports. > > My only concern is the 10kRPM vs 15kRPM. The advantage of the 10k > disks is that it would come from the same vendor as the systems to > which it will be connected, making procurement easier. 15K drives (well, the Seagate Cheetah X15's that I have a lot of at least) can run very hot compared to the 10K's. Might be worth bearing (no pun intended) in mind. Other than that, without knowing the full specs of the drives, you've got 2 extra spindles and a probably-lower-seek time if you go for the X15's so that would seem likely to be the faster option. Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:03:27 -0000 "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto > > Vivek Khera > > > I have a choice to make on a RAID enclosure: > > > > 14x 36GB 15kRPM ultra 320 SCSI drives > > > > OR > > > > 12x 72GB 10kRPM ultra 320 SCSI drives > > > > both would be configured into RAID 10 over two SCSI channels using > > a megaraid 320-2x card. > > 15K drives (well, the Seagate Cheetah X15's that I have a lot of at > least) can run very hot compared to the 10K's. Might be worth bearing > (no pun intended) in mind. > > Other than that, without knowing the full specs of the drives, you've > got 2 extra spindles and a probably-lower-seek time if you go for the > X15's so that would seem likely to be the faster option. I agree, the extra spindles and lower seek times are better if all you are concerned about is raw speed. However, that has to be balanced, from an overall perspective, with the nice single point of ordering/contact/support/warranty of the one vendor. It's a tough call. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> http://www.wiles.org --------------------------------- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| Frank Wiles wrote: > > > I agree, the extra spindles and lower seek times are better if all > you are concerned about is raw speed. > > However, that has to be balanced, from an overall perspective, with > the nice single point of ordering/contact/support/warranty of the > one vendor. It's a tough call. Well, if your favourite dealer can't supply you with such common equipment as 15k drives you should consider changing the dealer. They don't seem to be aware of db hardware reqirements. Regards, Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| ||||
| On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:50 AM, Andreas Pflug wrote: > Well, if your favourite dealer can't supply you with such common > equipment as 15k drives you should consider changing the dealer. > They don't seem to be aware of db hardware reqirements. Thanks to all for your opinions. I'm definitely sticking with 15k drives like I've done in the past for all my other servers. The reason I considered the 10k was because of the simplicity of ordering from the same vendor. They do offer 15k drives, but at double the capacity I needed (73GB drives) which would make the cost way high and overkill for what I need. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|