You are quite incorrect in stating that MySQL can now claim "parity" with
PostgreSQL through it's release of version 5.0.

Knowledgeable database experts and administrators who are famiiar with
both technologies are aware of "considerable " differences that, at this
time
still accrue to postgreSQL, e.g. for one example - Object Relational
functions.

Please limit your statements to areas where you have "some" knowledge
or understanding of the subject matter.


W. Anderson
Ontario, Canada

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

On Oct 21, 2005, at 0:38 , Wendell Anderson wrote:

> You are quite incorrect in stating that MySQL can now claim
> "parity" with
> PostgreSQL through it's release of version 5.0.

Mr Anderson,

Who are you writing to? cegarry(at)yahoo.com? Are you referring to
this article?

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1876702,00.asp

I skimmed it, but didn't see any mention of PostgreSQL. Perhaps I
missed it, or perhaps you mean another article?


Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org