This is a discussion on problems with SELECT query results within the pgsql Sql forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hello, I am new to this list and have been working with PostgreSQL since January. Here is my problem, ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello, I am new to this list and have been working with PostgreSQL since January. Here is my problem, I hope someone here has some experience or can point me in the right direction. I am writing the following query for a C# program I am writing: SELECT 'PV.LINEITEM:' || partnum || ',' || round(onhand) || ',' || round(qm5) || ',' || round(lsm4) || ',' || ',' || ',' || round(onorder) || ',' || ',' || ',' || binone || ',' || ',' || round(backorderqty) || ',' || ',' || round(onhold) || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || round(qtyperjob) || ',' || round(ordermax) AS gmrim FROM slparts WHERE vendor LIKE 'CH%' The query does work and I am getting results from the database. There are values for all 'partnum' in the database, however, the query results include blank fields here and there in between the returned records. Why am I receiving blank fields for 'gmrim'???? This absolutely defies logic and I cannot find any rhyme or reason for this problem. I cannot have any blank rows in the query, and again the database is completely populated with values. Could someone give me an explanation or tell me why I am receiving blank rows here and there as a query result. If you need further clarification of this problem or have any questions for me to arrive at a conclusion please feel free to send them to me and I will be more than happy to open a dialog in order to solve this problem. Thanks in advance for assistance. Cordially, Joshua Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate |
| |||
| Joshua wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to this list and have been working with PostgreSQL since January. > > Here is my problem, I hope someone here has some experience or can point > me in the right direction. I am writing the following query for a C# > program I am writing: > > SELECT 'PV.LINEITEM:' || partnum || ',' || round(onhand) || ',' || > round(qm5) || ',' || round(lsm4) || ',' || ',' || ',' || round(onorder) > || ',' || ',' || ',' || binone || ',' || ',' || round(backorderqty) || > ',' || ',' || round(onhold) || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || > ',' || round(qtyperjob) || ',' || round(ordermax) AS gmrim FROM slparts > WHERE vendor LIKE 'CH%' > > The query does work and I am getting results from the database. There > are values for all 'partnum' in the database, however, the query results > include blank fields here and there in between the returned records. Why > am I receiving blank fields for 'gmrim'???? This absolutely defies logic > and I cannot find any rhyme or reason for this problem. I cannot have > any blank rows in the query, and again the database is completely > populated with values. I'm not sure it is - I think you've got a NULL somewhere. Since NULL means "unknown" ('text' || NULL) = NULL Wrap all your column-references in COALESCE: e.g. COALESCE(partnum,'') and see if that solves it. If so, go back and find rows WHERE partnum IS NULL and correct them. Then set the NOT NULL constraint on the relevant columns. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| Hello, Thank you all for your assistance. I did end up finding NULL in the 'onorder' column which should have been zero's.... this was in a test table that happened to have some NULL in it for one reason or another but I should not find this in the production version of the table. I also appreciate you pointing out the COALESCE function. I will find that helpful in future work. I look forward to hopefully assisting you guys with some of your PostgreSQL dilemmas in the future! Thanks again!!! -Joshua Richard Huxton wrote: > Joshua wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am new to this list and have been working with PostgreSQL since >> January. >> >> Here is my problem, I hope someone here has some experience or can >> point me in the right direction. I am writing the following query for >> a C# program I am writing: >> >> SELECT 'PV.LINEITEM:' || partnum || ',' || round(onhand) || ',' || >> round(qm5) || ',' || round(lsm4) || ',' || ',' || ',' || >> round(onorder) || ',' || ',' || ',' || binone || ',' || ',' || >> round(backorderqty) || ',' || ',' || round(onhold) || ',' || ',' || >> ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || ',' || round(qtyperjob) || ',' || >> round(ordermax) AS gmrim FROM slparts WHERE vendor LIKE 'CH%' >> >> The query does work and I am getting results from the database. There >> are values for all 'partnum' in the database, however, the query >> results include blank fields here and there in between the returned >> records. Why am I receiving blank fields for 'gmrim'???? This >> absolutely defies logic and I cannot find any rhyme or reason for >> this problem. I cannot have any blank rows in the query, and again >> the database is completely populated with values. > > I'm not sure it is - I think you've got a NULL somewhere. > > Since NULL means "unknown" ('text' || NULL) = NULL > > Wrap all your column-references in COALESCE: e.g. COALESCE(partnum,'') > and see if that solves it. If so, go back and find rows WHERE partnum > IS NULL and correct them. Then set the NOT NULL constraint on the > relevant columns. > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| Joshua wrote: > Thank you all for your assistance. I did end up finding NULL in the > 'onorder' column which should have been zero's.... this was in a test > table that happened to have some NULL in it for one reason or another > but I should not find this in the production version of the table. > > I also appreciate you pointing out the COALESCE function. I will find > that helpful in future work. > > I look forward to hopefully assisting you guys with some of your > PostgreSQL dilemmas in the future! Please do not top-post, and be sure to acknowledge both groups to whom you multi-posted, pgsql.sql and pgsql.general, for their help. (I don't know if there were others.) A more effective way to post to multiple groups is to cross-post, send to all groups in the single message as I did here, which unifies the threads so that all answers appear to each reader. Multi-posting (sending to each group separately) is frustrating because it fragments the conversation. -- Lew |
| ||||
| --- Joshua <joshua@joshuaneil.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you all for your assistance. I did end up finding NULL in the > 'onorder' column which should have been zero's.... this was in a test > table that happened to have some NULL in it for one reason or another > but I should not find this in the production version of the table. If this should be allowed to have nulls, you should add a not null constraint to your table to prevent this sort of thing from happening. If a field should have zero's instead of nulls, you should also add a default value of zero for this column. ALTER TABLE Slparts ALTER COLUMN onorder SET NOT NULL, ALTER COLUMN onorder SET DEFAULT 0; Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|