This is a discussion on query to select a linked list within the pgsql Sql forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hi, To build a threaded forum application I came up the following schema: forum ------ id_forum | integer| not ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, To build a threaded forum application I came up the following schema: forum ------ id_forum | integer| not null default nextval('forum_id_forum_seq'::regclass) id_parent| integer| subject | text | not null message | text | Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied post (empty if first post). How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? Thanks, ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| "Louis-David Mitterrand" <vindex+lists-pgsql-sql@apartia.org> writes: > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > post (empty if first post). > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? You would need recursive queries which Postgres doesn't support. There is a patch out there to add support but I don't think it's up-to-date with 8.2 and in any case the resulting queries can be quite intense. I would recommend you look into the contrib module named "ltree". It's easy to use and works well with the gist indexes. It does require changing your data model denormalizing it slightly which makes it hard to "reparent" children, but if that isn't an operation you have to support I think it makes most other operations you might want to do much easier to support. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Louis-David Mitterrand" <vindex+lists-pgsql-sql@apartia.org> writes: > > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > > post (empty if first post). > > > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? > > You would need recursive queries which Postgres doesn't support. There is a > patch out there to add support but I don't think it's up-to-date with 8.2 and > in any case the resulting queries can be quite intense. > > I would recommend you look into the contrib module named "ltree". It's easy to > use and works well with the gist indexes. It does require changing your data > model denormalizing it slightly which makes it hard to "reparent" children, > but if that isn't an operation you have to support I think it makes most other > operations you might want to do much easier to support. After looking around a little I came to the same conclusions. Thanks for you help, Cheers, ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| On 5/9/07, Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-pgsql-sql@apartia.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > To build a threaded forum application I came up the following schema: > > forum > ------ > id_forum | integer| not null default > nextval('forum_id_forum_seq'::regclass) > id_parent| integer| > subject | text | not null > message | text | > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > post (empty if first post). > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? > > Thanks, > Unlike Oracle, PostgreSQL doesn't have anything like a connect by so you would need to write your own stored procedure for that (if new versions of PostgreSQL will have connect by, let me know guys). What I did was add a little redundancy to my forum tables and had a table structure kind of like this: forum forum_id BIGSERIAL PK, name VARCHAR(50) forum_topic forum_topic_id BIGSERIAL PK, forum_id BIGINT FK to forum forum_post forum_post_id BIGSERIAL PK, create_dt TIMESTAMP, subject VARCHAR(255), message TEXT, forum_topic_id BIGINT FK to forum_topic and if you want threading, you add a parent_forum_post_id to forum_post (this is where you get the redundancy since only the top forum_post record needs a reference to forum_topic and forum_topic wouldn't even really be needed. -Aaron -- ================================================== ================ Aaron Bono Aranya Software Technologies, Inc. http://www.aranya.com http://codeelixir.com ================================================== ================ |
| |||
| Στις Τετάρτη 09 Μάιος 2007 15:55, ο/η Louis-David Mitterrand *γραψε: > Hi, > > To build a threaded forum application I came up the following schema: > > forum > ------ > id_forum | integer| not null default > nextval('forum_id_forum_seq'::regclass) id_parent| integer| > subject | text | not null > message | text | > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > post (empty if first post). > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? > Your question is about storing hierarchies in postgresql. One way is to use the genealogical approach, where we store for any node the path to its root. I have used this technique to store description of tanker vessels machinery (over 1M items) and the plan maintenance on them, and the performance is very good, while the representation is highly intuitive and flexible, unlike some wierd approcahes i have hit on. When i did a small research on the complexity/index usage on various operations (UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE, SELECT), the performance was at least as good as the "nested pair" approch that many seemed to promote. You add a column "parents" (rather than just the parentid) as an integer[]. For every node you store the path to the root node starting from the most immediate ancestor. Then you just make an index on this column using the intarray contrib package. Then you can easily query for nodes under a specific node, or for nodes just one level below a specific node, nodes with no descendents (leaf nodes) etc... Of course you could do smth simpler, but in the long run, representing data in the correct way will certainly pay off. > Thanks, > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Achilleas Mantzios ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:55:20PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > Hi, > > To build a threaded forum application I came up the following schema: > > forum > ------ > id_forum | integer| not null default nextval('forum_id_forum_seq'::regclass) > id_parent| integer| > subject | text | not null > message | text | > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > post (empty if first post). > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? I am trying to write a recursive pl/sql function to return all thread children: create or replace function forum_children(integer) returns setof forum as $$ declare rec record; begin for rec in select * from forum where $1 in (id_parent,id_forum) loop select * from forum_children(rec.id_forum); return next rec; end loop; return; end; $$ language 'plpgsql'; But it does not work as intended (infinite loop?). What did I miss? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| |||
| On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 04:30:21PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:55:20PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > > Hi, > > > > To build a threaded forum application I came up the following schema: > > > > forum > > ------ > > id_forum | integer| not null default nextval('forum_id_forum_seq'::regclass) > > id_parent| integer| > > subject | text | not null > > message | text | > > > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > > post (empty if first post). > > > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? > > I am trying to write a recursive pl/sql function to return all thread > children: > > create or replace function forum_children(integer) returns setof forum as $$ > declare > rec record; > begin > > for rec in select * from forum where $1 in (id_parent,id_forum) loop Oops, I meant : for rec in select * from forum where id_parent=$1 loop which works fine. Sorry, > select * from forum_children(rec.id_forum); > return next rec; > > end loop; > > return; > > end; > $$ language 'plpgsql'; > > > But it does not work as intended (infinite loop?). > > What did I miss? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate |
| |||
| On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 08:24, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Louis-David Mitterrand" <vindex+lists-pgsql-sql@apartia.org> writes: > > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to the replied > > post (empty if first post). > > > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a thread? > > You would need recursive queries which Postgres doesn't support. There is a > patch out there to add support but I don't think it's up-to-date with 8.2 and > in any case the resulting queries can be quite intense. > > I would recommend you look into the contrib module named "ltree". It's easy to > use and works well with the gist indexes. It does require changing your data > model denormalizing it slightly which makes it hard to "reparent" children, > but if that isn't an operation you have to support I think it makes most other > operations you might want to do much easier to support. Are you sure the tablefunc functions, which include both connectby and crosstab functions, aren't up to date with 8.2? They certainly are up to 8.1, where I'm running them right now on my workstation. They built for 8.2 and installed, but I haven't tried using them. I would think that connectby is at least worth looking into. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 08:29, Aaron Bono wrote: > On 5/9/07, Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-pgsql-sql@apartia.org> > wrote: > Hi, > > To build a threaded forum application I came up the following > schema: > > forum > ------ > id_forum | integer| not null default > nextval('forum_id_forum_seq'::regclass) > id_parent| integer| > subject | text | not null > message | text | > > Each message a unique id_forum and an id_parent pointing to > the replied > post (empty if first post). > > How can I build an elegant query to select all messages in a > thread? > > Thanks, > > Unlike Oracle, PostgreSQL doesn't have anything like a connect by so > you would need to write your own stored procedure for that (if new > versions of PostgreSQL will have connect by, let me know guys). Take a look at the tablefunc in contrib, that seems to provide connectby. I've only ever used the crosstab functions in there, but I can't see what would have broken in connectby with 8.2 or anything. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| ||||
| "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes: > Are you sure the tablefunc functions, which include both connectby and > crosstab functions, aren't up to date with 8.2? They certainly are up > to 8.1, where I'm running them right now on my workstation. They built > for 8.2 and installed, but I haven't tried using them. > > I would think that connectby is at least worth looking into. Uhm, no, I guess I'm not sure. I didn't realize it was in the tablefunc module either. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate |