SEO

The automated system administration scripts, which are copies of the
scripts in active use on our Solaris 2.X, Linux (RedHat and Mandrake),
SGI IRIX 6.X, and FreeBSD 5.X systems; they also were used on
SunOS 4.1.X, HP (HP-UX 9.X), SGI (IRIX 5.X).
They are available as files 'autoadmin.shar.*' from URL:
http://www.noc.utoronto.ca/~mikep/unix/
(Note: these files were last updated Aug 1, 2006).

The dot file scripts, which are copies of the .cshrc / .login / .profile
/ etc scripts in active use on our Solaris 2.X, Linux (RedHat and Mandrake),
SGI IRIX 6.X, and FreeBSD 5.X systems; they also were used on
SunOS 4.1.X, HP (HP-UX 9.X), SGI (IRIX 5.X).
They are available as files 'dotfiles.shar.*' from URL:
http://www.noc.utoronto.ca/~mikep/unix/
(Note: these files were last updated Aug 1, 2006).

The BSD to HP-UX porting tricks, a set of notes and helpful C routines
for porting programs to HP-UX, are available from URL:
http://www.noc.utoronto.ca/~mikep/unix/HPTRICKS
This file also contains a driver program and functions to obtain the
load average on a wide variety of systems, including HP-UX, IRIX,
SunOS, Solaris, DEC OSF, Stardent(!), and even for systems with no
/dev/kmem access (or if you can't get your program to be setgid to the
"kmem" group because you do not have 'root' access).
(Note: this file was last updated Jun 16, 1999).
--
In the corporate food chain, I am plankton. Mike Peterson
U/T Network Security
E-mail: mikep@noc.utoronto.ca Tel: 416-978-5230
WWW: http://www.noc.utoronto.ca/~mikep/ Fax: 416-971-1362

Mike Peterson wrote:
> The automated system administration scripts, which are copies of the

On the off chance you ever read what you automatically post (always at
0600, so obviously automatically done), is there any chance you could
stop it? The files have not changed for ages, so why keep sending the
message?

It seems you have taken automation too far to me.

On Mar 5, 12:03 am, Dave <f...@coo.com> wrote:
> Mike Peterson wrote:
> > The automated system administration scripts, which are copies of the
> On the off chance you ever read what you automatically post (always at
> 0600, so obviously automatically done), is there any chance you could
> stop it? The files have not changed for ages, so why keep sending the
> message?
> It seems you have taken automation too far to me.

Yes. Its worse than that as some of the links dont even exist anymore.
Anyway, I killfiled this chump's multi-posts long ago : >