vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I downloaded Perl 5.80 from a mirror of Sunfreeware and installed it on a test Solaris 5.8 system using pkgadd, wishing to replace the rather venerable 5.005 or so Perl that had come pre-installed. It appeared to install ok, but I was slightly surprised to find that /usr/bin/perl was still the old version. Is it correct and sufficient, after doing the pkgadd, to copy or link the executables in /usr/local/perl5/bin (perl, perldoc, etc) to /usr/bin? This is in fact what I did on my test system, and it seemed to work ok, but being relatively new to Sun/Solaris, I had expected pkgadd to do all that was necessary to make the new version available by default. The value of @INC looks correct and all the new /usr/local/perl5/lib or whatever, is there ok. Should I have attempted to pkgrm the old one first? (I did save copies of the old versions in /usr/bin, to be on the safe side). Thank you. -- mike@ellwoods.org.uk |
| |||
| > Is it correct and sufficient, after doing the pkgadd, to copy or link > the executables in /usr/local/perl5/bin (perl, perldoc, etc) to /usr/bin? I believe it is ok to remove /usr/bin/perl but leave /usr/perl5/* alone as it is needed by the system. |
| ||||
| >> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:27:55 +0000, >> Mike Ellwood <mike@ellwoods.org.uk> said: > I downloaded Perl 5.80 from a mirror of Sunfreeware and > installed it on a test Solaris 5.8 system using pkgadd, > wishing to replace the rather venerable 5.005 or so Perl > that had come pre-installed. http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solari...is2.html#q3.75 hth t |