This is a discussion on Re: Optimising performance of Perl binary on Solaris within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Neil Griffin <neil.griffin@nospam.com> wrote: > Hi, [snip] > > My questions are: > > 1. Am I going to ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Neil Griffin <neil.griffin@nospam.com> wrote: > Hi, [snip] > > My questions are: > > 1. Am I going to gain any performance compiling as a 64bit app, or should I > stick with 32bit. The O/S and Oracle are 64bit. I don't think so ... > 2. Are there any performance advantages moving to Perl 5.8? I read mixed > reports on this. Well this depends; I would stick to the version of perl you are using this will let you see performance without having to chase bug introduced by the newer perl version. > 5. Are there any other compilation/configuration issues I should consider? Perl modules should also be recompiled ... -- http://perso.hirlimann.net/~ludo/blog/ |
| ||||
| Yes I will be re-making (re-compiling) all of the 40+ modules :-(. Ludovic Hirlimann wrote in message <1g1aeiu.vqxzpka1rbauN%ludonews@nerim.net>... >Neil Griffin <neil.griffin@nospam.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >[snip] >> >> My questions are: >> >> 1. Am I going to gain any performance compiling as a 64bit app, or should I >> stick with 32bit. The O/S and Oracle are 64bit. > >I don't think so ... > >> 2. Are there any performance advantages moving to Perl 5.8? I read mixed >> reports on this. > >Well this depends; I would stick to the version of perl you are using >this will let you see performance without having to chase bug introduced >by the newer perl version. > > >> 5. Are there any other compilation/configuration issues I should consider? > >Perl modules should also be recompiled ... > >-- >http://perso.hirlimann.net/~ludo/blog/ |