This is a discussion on Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking? within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I just reviewed the HCL for solaris 9 & 10 x86 and noticed none of the top HBA's are ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I just reviewed the HCL for solaris 9 & 10 x86 and noticed none of the top HBA's are listed. I'm sure that at least 1 out of QLogic, Emulex, and JNI would be supported correct? Sun even has new HBA's that use JNI's chipsets and I believe they used QLogic's chipsets in the past. If JNI has a driver for the x86 platform can I assume it works well enough for entperprise purposes and that Sun will support my system? We are wanting to move an Oracle RAC to 10g on AMD64/Solaris x86 but are honestly shocked at the lack of hardware support. Sun claims to have a 'renewed dedication to supporting and developing Solaris x86 with version 10' but the current HCL doesn't give me much confidence in that claim. I don't desire moving to the Linux 2.4 kernel and 2.6 kernel certification/support is still lacking and just too new to risk. (currently testing on Fedora Core 2 and not very impressed with the 2.6 kernel under heavy enterprise loads, we still see issues with the scheduler which was supposed to be completely re-worked and rock-solid in the 2.6 kernel) Thanks for any usefull info rhugga |
| ||||
| On 2004-10-28 11:22:36 -0400, rhugga@yahoo.com (Keg) said: > I just reviewed the HCL for solaris 9 & 10 x86 and noticed none of the > top HBA's are listed. I'm sure that at least 1 out of QLogic, Emulex, > and JNI would be supported correct? Sun even has new HBA's that use > JNI's chipsets and I believe they used QLogic's chipsets in the past. > If JNI has a driver for the x86 platform can I assume it works well > enough for entperprise purposes and that Sun will support my system? > > We are wanting to move an Oracle RAC to 10g on AMD64/Solaris x86 but > are honestly shocked at the lack of hardware support. Sun claims to > have a 'renewed dedication to supporting and developing Solaris x86 > with version 10' but the current HCL doesn't give me much confidence > in that claim. I don't desire moving to the Linux 2.4 kernel and 2.6 > kernel certification/support is still lacking and just too new to > risk. (currently testing on Fedora Core 2 and not very impressed with > the 2.6 kernel under heavy enterprise loads, we still see issues with > the scheduler which was supposed to be completely re-worked and > rock-solid in the 2.6 kernel) > > Thanks for any usefull info > rhugga Most HBA's will come with their drives even Sun dont bundle all drivers with Solaris. Qlogic has always shipped drivers for Solaris so I dont see this as an issue really. -- Unix Systems Engineer The City of New York Dept. of Information Technology http://www.nyc.gov/doitt rbrown[(@)]doitt.nyc.gov http://www.rodrickbrown.com |