Unix Technical Forum

Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking?

This is a discussion on Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking? within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I just reviewed the HCL for solaris 9 & 10 x86 and noticed none of the top HBA's are ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > Sun Solaris Administration

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 08:59 AM
Keg
 
Posts: n/a
Default Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking?

I just reviewed the HCL for solaris 9 & 10 x86 and noticed none of the
top HBA's are listed. I'm sure that at least 1 out of QLogic, Emulex,
and JNI would be supported correct? Sun even has new HBA's that use
JNI's chipsets and I believe they used QLogic's chipsets in the past.
If JNI has a driver for the x86 platform can I assume it works well
enough for entperprise purposes and that Sun will support my system?

We are wanting to move an Oracle RAC to 10g on AMD64/Solaris x86 but
are honestly shocked at the lack of hardware support. Sun claims to
have a 'renewed dedication to supporting and developing Solaris x86
with version 10' but the current HCL doesn't give me much confidence
in that claim. I don't desire moving to the Linux 2.4 kernel and 2.6
kernel certification/support is still lacking and just too new to
risk. (currently testing on Fedora Core 2 and not very impressed with
the 2.6 kernel under heavy enterprise loads, we still see issues with
the scheduler which was supposed to be completely re-worked and
rock-solid in the 2.6 kernel)

Thanks for any usefull info
rhugga
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 09:00 AM
Rodrick Brown
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris 9/10 x86 HCL, ugh, severly lacking?

On 2004-10-28 11:22:36 -0400, rhugga@yahoo.com (Keg) said:

> I just reviewed the HCL for solaris 9 & 10 x86 and noticed none of the
> top HBA's are listed. I'm sure that at least 1 out of QLogic, Emulex,
> and JNI would be supported correct? Sun even has new HBA's that use
> JNI's chipsets and I believe they used QLogic's chipsets in the past.
> If JNI has a driver for the x86 platform can I assume it works well
> enough for entperprise purposes and that Sun will support my system?
>
> We are wanting to move an Oracle RAC to 10g on AMD64/Solaris x86 but
> are honestly shocked at the lack of hardware support. Sun claims to
> have a 'renewed dedication to supporting and developing Solaris x86
> with version 10' but the current HCL doesn't give me much confidence
> in that claim. I don't desire moving to the Linux 2.4 kernel and 2.6
> kernel certification/support is still lacking and just too new to
> risk. (currently testing on Fedora Core 2 and not very impressed with
> the 2.6 kernel under heavy enterprise loads, we still see issues with
> the scheduler which was supposed to be completely re-worked and
> rock-solid in the 2.6 kernel)
>
> Thanks for any usefull info
> rhugga


Most HBA's will come with their drives even Sun dont bundle all drivers
with Solaris.
Qlogic has always shipped drivers for Solaris so I dont see this as an
issue really.

--
Unix Systems Engineer
The City of New York
Dept. of Information Technology
http://www.nyc.gov/doitt
rbrown[(@)]doitt.nyc.gov
http://www.rodrickbrown.com

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com