Unix Technical Forum

Sun StorEdge 3310 redundancy/failover

This is a discussion on Sun StorEdge 3310 redundancy/failover within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Hi, for some application running on Solaris we needed to purchase Sun StorEdge 3310. It has 2 SCSI controllers ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > Sun Solaris Administration

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 08:58 AM
jmiklo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sun StorEdge 3310 redundancy/failover

Hi,
for some application running on Solaris we needed to purchase Sun StorEdge
3310. It has 2 SCSI controllers and 5 disks (2disks x2 for mirror, and one
for hot spare).
Now we'd like to test redundancy of this storage config.
Are we allowed to physically detach disk so we can observer 5th disk used ?
I'd like to be sure that in case of disaster failover will work fine (either
with failed disk, or failed controller).
How could I test it so we can be sure ?
We tested failovering to standby scsi controller, with following commands:
sccli> show redundancy

sccli> fail primary

failover to standby controller takes more that a minute and during this time
writing to directory where storage disk is mounted is not possible. Is this
normal or should it take much shorter time ?

thanks a lot,
jmiklo


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 08:58 AM
Scott Howard
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sun StorEdge 3310 redundancy/failover

In comp.unix.solaris jmiklo <jmiklo@hotmail.com> wrote:
> for some application running on Solaris we needed to purchase Sun StorEdge
> 3310. It has 2 SCSI controllers and 5 disks (2disks x2 for mirror, and one
> for hot spare).
> Now we'd like to test redundancy of this storage config.
> Are we allowed to physically detach disk so we can observer 5th disk used ?


It's not really recommended, but it won't break anything.

> sccli> fail primary
>
> failover to standby controller takes more that a minute and during this time


No. It should happen within less than a second. Not sure what would cause
it to take so long for the failover.

Scott
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com