This is a discussion on SunPCi CD-ROM problem - am I a shared library missing? within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I have a SunPCi II pro card and are having difficulties accessing the CD-ROM from within Windows 2000 Professional. ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I have a SunPCi II pro card and are having difficulties accessing the CD-ROM from within Windows 2000 Professional. The PDF file "Troubleshooting SunPCi II CD-ROM Access Problems" http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/sunpci/cd-rom.pdf says (bottom of page 4) there needs to be a file action_sunpci.so in /usr/lib/rmmount overwise the CD-ROM won't be seen in Microsoft Windows. I've installed the SunPCi II Pro card and the software (2.3.2), but there is no action_sunpci.so file. The document on Sun's site shows information about Solaris 8, so perhaps this is no longer needed in Solaris 9, although this seems a bit unlikely. Any suggestions? |
| ||||
| i have solaris 9 and it works fine.. i have a action_sunpci.so.1 file in /usr/lib/rmmount also check your sunpci.ini file: [Drives] A drive=/dev/rdiskette CD=/vol/dev/aliases/cdrom0 C drive=/export/home/pc/XP.diskimage [Disk32] Enabled=Yes Hector "Fred Smith" <sorry_no_tinedmeat@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1837c1be.0401120656.2eb324ef@posting.google.c om... > I have a SunPCi II pro card and are having difficulties accessing the > CD-ROM from within Windows 2000 Professional. The PDF file > "Troubleshooting SunPCi II CD-ROM Access Problems" > > http://www.sun.com/desktop/products/sunpci/cd-rom.pdf > > > says (bottom of page 4) there needs to be a file action_sunpci.so in > /usr/lib/rmmount overwise the CD-ROM won't be seen in Microsoft > Windows. I've installed the SunPCi II Pro card and the software > (2.3.2), but there is no action_sunpci.so file. > > The document on Sun's site shows information about Solaris 8, so > perhaps this is no longer needed in Solaris 9, although this seems a > bit unlikely. > > Any suggestions? |