vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| When a make ufsdump /usr/sbin/ufsdump 0uf Server1:/dev/rmt/On /export/home I have this message DUMP: Dumping (Pass IV) [regular files] DUMP: Warning - block 1543503872 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 1549533184 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 2796199086 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 3370698982 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 3892314112 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 1556664992 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 3270035152 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 3770869958 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' DUMP: Warning - block 3503480012 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' ....... Thanks |
| |||
| lolo wrote: > When a make ufsdump > /usr/sbin/ufsdump 0uf Server1:/dev/rmt/On /export/home > > I have this message > > DUMP: Dumping (Pass IV) [regular files] > DUMP: Warning - block 1543503872 is beyond the end of `/dev/md/rdsk/d3' > ...... > Try fsck'ing the filesystem, also check and fsck the meta sub devices if applicable, ie if there are physical disks as sub mirrors. /00 |
| |||
| I guess that you have UFS logging activated on this file system? We saw this after we switched to UFS logging on our filesystem. We tried to report this as a bug to Sun Support but since we're running ufsdump in multi-user mode (like everybody else), they would not accept this as a bug (see the man page for ufsdump). The solution for us was to switch to tar instead. Best Reg Ake H |
| |||
| "ake.removethis.hjalmarsson(@)gmail.com" <ake.hjalmarsson@gmail.com> writes: > I guess that you have UFS logging activated on this file system? > We saw this after we switched to UFS logging on our filesystem. > We tried to report this as a bug to Sun Support but since we're > running ufsdump in multi-user mode (like everybody else), they > would not accept this as a bug (see the man page for ufsdump). > > The solution for us was to switch to tar instead. But tar is not a backup application. man fssnap > > > Best Reg > > Ake H > Thomas |
| |||
| "ake.removethis.hjalmarsson(@)gmail.com" <ake.hjalmarsson@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess that you have UFS logging activated on this file system? > We saw this after we switched to UFS logging on our filesystem. > We tried to report this as a bug to Sun Support but since we're > running ufsdump in multi-user mode (like everybody else), they > would not accept this as a bug (see the man page for ufsdump). Or more specifically, see the man page for fssnap. Yes, "everybody else" might run ufsdump in multi-user mode (which in itself isn't a problem), but not everyone uses it on an active filesystem - fssnap sees to that. Scott |