This is a discussion on Veritas NetBackup v4.5 question within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Hi, maybe a trivial question but I can't find the answer to that one in the documentation: Does Veritas ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, maybe a trivial question but I can't find the answer to that one in the documentation: Does Veritas NetBackup Business Server v4.5 support multiple tape backups of a single file in a robot configuration? I.e. we have a Sun L8 robot with DLT drive inside (sorry, I don't know the exact terminology) and a 100GB file that doesn't fit onto a single 40GB DLT. Would the NetBackup automatically pull the new tape and continue the backup of the file or will it report an error and abort? Documentation of NetBackup mentions parallel and multiplexed backups, but nothing about the cases like this. Unless this is so obvious and standard feature not even worth mentioning. So, would the above work? Thanks and bye, Dragan -- Dragan Cvetkovic, To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer !!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!! |
| |||
| On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:07:29 -0500, Dragan Cvetkovic <me@privacy.net> wrote: > Hi, > >maybe a trivial question but I can't find the answer to that one in the >documentation: Does Veritas NetBackup Business Server v4.5 support multiple >tape backups of a single file in a robot configuration? I.e. we have a Sun >L8 robot with DLT drive inside (sorry, I don't know the exact terminology) >and a 100GB file that doesn't fit onto a single 40GB DLT. Would the >NetBackup automatically pull the new tape and continue the backup of the >file or will it report an error and abort? It will mount another available tape and continue where it left off. > >Documentation of NetBackup mentions parallel and multiplexed backups, but >nothing about the cases like this. Unless this is so obvious and standard >feature not even worth mentioning. Of course, duplexing would require multiple drives. >So, would the above work? > >Thanks and bye, Dragan -- gburnore at DataBasix dot Com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- How you look depends on where you go. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³ | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³ Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³ | ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³ Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase ================================================== ========================= |
| ||||
| Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com> writes: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:07:29 -0500, Dragan Cvetkovic <me@privacy.net> > wrote: >> I.e. we have a Sun >>L8 robot with DLT drive inside (sorry, I don't know the exact terminology) >>and a 100GB file that doesn't fit onto a single 40GB DLT. Would the >>NetBackup automatically pull the new tape and continue the backup of the >>file or will it report an error and abort? > > It will mount another available tape and continue where it left off. Perfect. Thanks Gary Bye, Dragan -- Dragan Cvetkovic, To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer !!! Sender/From address is bogus. Use reply-to one !!! |