Unix Technical Forum

9.4 upgrade SHMVIRTSIZE problem

This is a discussion on 9.4 upgrade SHMVIRTSIZE problem within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Upgrade from 9.21 to 9.40 Windows NT Advanced server SP3 4 Gig ram Had had SHMVIRTSIZE set to 655360 ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Informix

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 09:01 AM
Andrew
 
Posts: n/a
Default 9.4 upgrade SHMVIRTSIZE problem

Upgrade from 9.21 to 9.40
Windows NT Advanced server SP3
4 Gig ram

Had had SHMVIRTSIZE set to 655360

Did the upgrade and Informix failed on setting up the Shared memory.
Worked OK if it was reduced - to 327680, and stepped up OK to 557056, but
after that it just falls over when you try to bring the bugger online.
Anyone got any ideas? Non Move to *ix realted, thanks. Just don't
understand how with nothing but the db version changed that suddenly starts
falling over.

Even just ideas about what to look at would be most welcome

ta
Andrew




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 09:01 AM
Art S. Kagel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 9.4 upgrade SHMVIRTSIZE problem

Andrew wrote:
> Upgrade from 9.21 to 9.40
> Windows NT Advanced server SP3
> 4 Gig ram
>
> Had had SHMVIRTSIZE set to 655360
>
> Did the upgrade and Informix failed on setting up the Shared memory.
> Worked OK if it was reduced - to 327680, and stepped up OK to 557056, but
> after that it just falls over when you try to bring the bugger online.
> Anyone got any ideas? Non Move to *ix realted, thanks. Just don't
> understand how with nothing but the db version changed that suddenly starts
> falling over.


It may be that the total of resident, virtual, and message segments exceeds
the OS max shared memory you can attach a process to. Why different than in
9.21? Because some other data structures in the RESIDENT segment may now be
larger than they were expanding that segment so that others need to be
smaller. Alternative to reducing SHMVIRTSIZE you may be able to reduce the
number of ipcshm connections in your NETTYPE parameters which will eliminate
some message (type M) shared memory and leave more room for virtual segments.

Art S. Kagel

> Even just ideas about what to look at would be most welcome
>
> ta
> Andrew
>
>
>
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com