This is a discussion on HDR feedback within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Just a little bit of feedback (for those interested). A while back I posted a reply to an HDR ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Just a little bit of feedback (for those interested). A while back I posted a reply to an HDR mail, saying that we have loads of problems with HDR, and I was about to give up on using HDR. We kept loosing the link between the 2, and I kept rebuilding the secondary server. We tried crossover cables & dedicated switches to stabalise the network, but this didn't work - which I couldn't understand, because I had a dedicated network connection between the 2! The servers each had 2 network cards, 1 on the private network (between the 2), and another on the public network (which kept dropping & coming back up again). My gut feel was that the interfaces on each server were affecting each other. The support engineers disagreed with me. We finally decided to load the latest patch release (being desperate), and voila, it solved the problem! I can only guess that a TCP related patch must have sorted out the problem. It wasn't Informix after all. On these 2 servers we are running: Solaris 9 (now with the latest patch release) IDS7.31FD3 Dirk Moolman Database and Unix Administrator MXGROUP "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."=20 -Kierkegaard=20 sending to informix-list |
| |||
| Could you please share with us the specific patch number? thanks esteban.- "Dirk Moolman" <DirkM@mxgroup.co.za> wrote in message news:<cjuku7$nai$1@news.xmission.com>... > Just a little bit of feedback (for those interested). A while back I > posted a reply to an HDR mail, saying that we have loads of problems > with HDR, and I was about to give up on using HDR. We kept loosing > the link between the 2, and I kept rebuilding the secondary server. > > We tried crossover cables & dedicated switches to stabalise the network, > but this didn't work - which I couldn't understand, because I had a > dedicated network connection between the 2! The servers each had 2 > network cards, 1 on the private network (between the 2), and another on > the public network (which kept dropping & coming back up again). > > My gut feel was that the interfaces on each server were affecting each > other. The support engineers disagreed with me. > > We finally decided to load the latest patch release (being desperate), > and voila, it solved the problem! I can only guess that a TCP related > patch must have sorted out the problem. It wasn't Informix after all. > > > On these 2 servers we are running: > > Solaris 9 (now with the latest patch release) > IDS7.31FD3 > > > > > > > Dirk Moolman > Database and Unix Administrator > MXGROUP > > > "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of > thought which they seldom use."=20 > -Kierkegaard=20 > > sending to informix-list |
| ||||
| Dirk Moolman wrote: > We finally decided to load the latest patch release (being desperate), > and voila, it solved the problem! I can only guess that a TCP related > patch must have sorted out the problem. It wasn't Informix after all. If HDR wasn't good IBM wouldn't be working on putting it in DB2 Regards, Fernando Nunes |