SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-20-2008, 07:03 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 More on Informix from Bloor Research. Hi All, I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised was when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) Makes interesting reading. Comments please and more noise people. More noise :-) http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 Traveller      |
|
04-20-2008, 07:04 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research. On 10 Nov 2004 04:25:39 -0800, vavavoom_th14@yahoo.co.uk (Traveller2003) wrote: >Hi All, > >I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised >was when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) >Makes interesting reading. Comments please and more noise people. More >noise >:-) > >http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 > > >Traveller Interesting article . . . I liked the final quote where . . . . "To conclude: there is good news and there is good news - on the one hand there is new technology emerging to support Informix users, while on the other IBM is listening." Think IBM is listening? Seems that way . . . JWC |
|
04-20-2008, 07:04 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research. On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:44:13 -0500, John Carlson wrote: > On 10 Nov 2004 04:25:39 -0800, vavavoom_th14@yahoo.co.uk (Traveller2003) > wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >>I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised was >>when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) Makes interesting >>reading. Comments please and more noise people. More noise :-) >> >>http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 >> >> >>Traveller > > > Interesting article . . . I liked the final quote where . . . . > > "To conclude: there is good news and there is good news - on the one hand > there is new technology emerging to support Informix users, while on the > other IBM is listening." > > Think IBM is listening? Seems that way . . . One bit of bad news, IBM will not support Coppereye in the same way that Informix supported Excaliber. This means that if there is a problem IBM and Coppereye will be finger pointing all over out cringing heads. Ah well, nothing's perfect. Art S. Kagel |
|
04-20-2008, 07:04 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research. Art, It's too early to know exactly how Coppereye will be supported by IBM. We (i.e. developement) didn't even know about Coppereye until the last user conference. M.P. "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message news  an.2004.11.11.08.50.25.907379.1355@bloomberg .net...> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:44:13 -0500, John Carlson wrote: > > > On 10 Nov 2004 04:25:39 -0800, vavavoom_th14@yahoo.co.uk (Traveller2003) > > wrote: > > > >>Hi All, > >> > >>I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised was > >>when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) Makes interesting > >>reading. Comments please and more noise people. More noise :-) > >> > >>http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 > >> > >> > >>Traveller > > > > > > Interesting article . . . I liked the final quote where . . . . > > > > "To conclude: there is good news and there is good news - on the one hand > > there is new technology emerging to support Informix users, while on the > > other IBM is listening." > > > > Think IBM is listening? Seems that way . . . > > One bit of bad news, IBM will not support Coppereye in the same way that > Informix supported Excaliber. This means that if there is a problem IBM and > Coppereye will be finger pointing all over out cringing heads. Ah well, > nothing's perfect. > > Art S. Kagel |
|
04-20-2008, 07:04 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research. On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:51:08 -0500, Madison Pruet wrote: Tell tech support please. Word here is we called IBM support and they said basically "It wasn't invented here and we didn't work with them on it, so we're not supporting it." Art S. Kagel > Art, > > It's too early to know exactly how Coppereye will be supported by IBM. We > (i.e. developement) didn't even know about Coppereye until the last user > conference. > > M.P. > > > "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message > news an.2004.11.11.08.50.25.907379.1355@bloomberg .net...>> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:44:13 -0500, John Carlson wrote: >> >> > On 10 Nov 2004 04:25:39 -0800, vavavoom_th14@yahoo.co.uk (Traveller2003) >> > wrote: >> > >> >>Hi All, >> >> >> >>I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised > was >> >>when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) Makes > interesting >> >>reading. Comments please and more noise people. More noise :-) >> >> >> >>http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 >> >> >> >> >> >>Traveller >> > >> > >> > Interesting article . . . I liked the final quote where . . . . >> > >> > "To conclude: there is good news and there is good news - on the one > hand >> > there is new technology emerging to support Informix users, while on the >> > other IBM is listening." >> > >> > Think IBM is listening? Seems that way . . . >> >> One bit of bad news, IBM will not support Coppereye in the same way that >> Informix supported Excaliber. This means that if there is a problem IBM > and >> Coppereye will be finger pointing all over out cringing heads. Ah well, >> nothing's perfect. >> >> Art S. Kagel |
|
04-20-2008, 07:04 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research. "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message news an.2004.11.11.17.28.28.89496.1355@bloomberg. net...> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:51:08 -0500, Madison Pruet wrote: > > Tell tech support please. Word here is we called IBM support and they > said > basically "It wasn't invented here and we didn't work with them on it, so > we're not supporting it." In fact, one of the top Informix technicians at IBM UK worked extensively with them and with test sites in the UK to integrate their technology into an Informix database. |
|
04-20-2008, 07:07 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: More on Informix from Bloor Research. inthe words of inspector cleauseau.... does your dog bite... that is not my dog..... Art S. Kagel wrote: >On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:44:13 -0500, John Carlson wrote: > > > >>On 10 Nov 2004 04:25:39 -0800, vavavoom_th14@yahoo.co.uk (Traveller2003) >>wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi All, >>> >>>I need a very very strong strong drink. Last time I was this surprised was >>>when spurs won the league even though I was not born :-) Makes interesting >>>reading. Comments please and more noise people. More noise :-) >>> >>>http://www.it-analysis.com/article.php?articleid=12379 >>> >>> >>>Traveller >>> >>> >>Interesting article . . . I liked the final quote where . . . . >> >>"To conclude: there is good news and there is good news - on the one hand >>there is new technology emerging to support Informix users, while on the >>other IBM is listening." >> >>Think IBM is listening? Seems that way . . . >> >> > >One bit of bad news, IBM will not support Coppereye in the same way that >Informix supported Excaliber. This means that if there is a problem IBM and >Coppereye will be finger pointing all over out cringing heads. Ah well, >nothing's perfect. > >Art S. Kagel > > |
 |
« RE: Anyone familiar with Excalibur?
|
War on Terrorism Videos! Frontline Videos, www.worldterrorismwatch.com »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM.
