This is a discussion on RE: Another IDS Feature Request within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Madison Pruet wrote: > "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message > news:43E0E317.2080907@bloomberg.net... > > bozon wrote: > > ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Madison Pruet wrote: > "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message > news:43E0E317.2080907@bloomberg.net... > > bozon wrote: > > > Art S. Kagel wrote: > > > > > >>bozon wrote: > > >> > > >>>It would help us. I think it would be a feature that > would really fit > > >>>in with the new redundant fault tolerant application > structure that is > > >>>popular today. > > >> > > >><SNIP> > > >> > > >>That raises an additional, related request. That the > global cursor ID > be > > >>sharable across ER replicants. That would allow cost > free failover to a > > >>backup server! > > >> > > > > By George I think he's got it! > > > Ain't gonna happen... > > The main purpose of a Cursor is to keep a pointer into the > table as the rows > are being processed. > > Since ER doesn't enforce the physical placement of the data, > then a cursor > on one server is meaningless on another. > > In fact Since ER is selective in what is replicated, we can't > guarentee that > the query plans on differing nodes will be the same.... > > M.P. Would it be doable in HDR? Paul M. |
| ||||
| <mosserp@wellsfargo.com> wrote in message news:mailman.375.1138825942.740.informix-list@iiug.org... Madison Pruet wrote: > "Art S. Kagel" <kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote in message > news:43E0E317.2080907@bloomberg.net... > > bozon wrote: > > > Art S. Kagel wrote: > > > > > >>bozon wrote: > > >> > > >>>It would help us. I think it would be a feature that > would really fit > > >>>in with the new redundant fault tolerant application > structure that is > > >>>popular today. > > >> > > >><SNIP> > > >> > > >>That raises an additional, related request. That the > global cursor ID > be > > >>sharable across ER replicants. That would allow cost > free failover to a > > >>backup server! > > >> > > > > By George I think he's got it! > > > Ain't gonna happen... > > The main purpose of a Cursor is to keep a pointer into the > table as the rows > are being processed. > > Since ER doesn't enforce the physical placement of the data, > then a cursor > on one server is meaningless on another. > > In fact Since ER is selective in what is replicated, we can't > guarentee that > the query plans on differing nodes will be the same.... > > M.P. Would it be doable in HDR? Paul M. more doable. There would be a major problem, however, because the the state of the cursor changes with each and every row that you touch within the query. That would mean a whole lot of network traffic. M.P. |