This is a discussion on RE: Checkpoint Duration - HDR - Sync/Async within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Hi, Francisco, The problem is that DSS query on secondary might take a lot of CPU/disk resources that a ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, Francisco, The problem is that DSS query on secondary might take a lot of CPU/disk resources that a requred to roll forward logical log records received from the primary. The first thing to do is to define whether it's CPU or disk bottneck on the secondary ------------------------------------------ Alexey Sonkin Senior Database Administrator > -----Original Message----- > From: Francisco Roldan [mailto:froldan@5b.com.gt] > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:48 AM > To: informix-list@iiug.org > Subject: RV: Checkpoint Duration - HDR - Sync/Async > > Hi everyboy, > > I really would appreciate your comments about this subject. > > Thanks in advance > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Francisco Roldan [mailto:froldan@5b.com.gt] > Enviado el: Miércoles, 01 de Octubre de 2003 12:30 p.m. > Para: informix-list@iiug.org > Asunto: Checkpoint Duration - HDR - Sync/Async > > Hi everybody, > my environment : > > Two identical servers running AIX 4.3.3 - IDS 7.3.1 UD1 > running HDR between both database servers > DRINTERVAL : 360 segs (=> ASYNCHRONOUS) > I have only one production database on Buffered Logging Mode. > > I implemented HDR in order to protect the data changed after the last > backup, and to be able to execute reports/DSS-querys on the secondary > server (in that order). > > I read that the checkpoint between primary and secondary servers running > HDR > are synchronous, regardless of DRINTERVAL parameter is > -1 (=> SYNCHRONOUS) or not. > > When i execute a very heavy dss query on my secondary server, it affects > the > performance on this server and i have noticed that it affects the duration > of the checkpoint on both servers (even getting 6 times the normal > duration). > It is logic if i consider that the checkpoints between primary and > secondary > servers are synchronous, am i right ? or am i missing something else that > could be affecting the checkpoints duration on both servers? > > Is it possible to minimize the impact on the primary server's checkpoint > duration ? For examble by tunning some parameters like DRINTERVAL, > CKPTINTVL(240 segs. on my servers), or the difference between these values > (I am just guessing). Or the Logging mode on my only production database. > > Thanks in advance > > Regards > > > sending to informix-list > > sending to informix-list sending to informix-list |