Unix Technical Forum

RE: Connection issues to IDS 9.3/9.4 on W2K

This is a discussion on RE: Connection issues to IDS 9.3/9.4 on W2K within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Sean Where is authentication taking place? Is it local or on the PDC? How many users are in the ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Informix

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 08:01 PM
Murray Wood \(IList\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Connection issues to IDS 9.3/9.4 on W2K


Sean

Where is authentication taking place? Is it local or on the PDC? How many
users are in the Windows user table?

MW

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org
> [mailtowner-informix-list@iiug.org]On Behalf Of Sean Kelsey
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2003 2:22 a.m.
> To: informix-list@iiug.org
> Subject: Connection issues to IDS 9.3/9.4 on W2K
>
>
> Afternoon all
>
> IDS 9.30 & 9.40
> Windows 2000 Advanced Server
> Dell PowerEdge 2640 with 2 x Xeon 2.8Ghz processors multithreaded to 4
> virtual processors (i.e. should be REALLY fast)
>
> Has anyone else experienced any latency issues (anywhere between 2-4
> seconds) when performing dbaccess connections or simply performing
> onstat commands??
>
> I have the same engine versions on a Windows 2000 Professional PC and
> do NOT experience ANY latency issues (i.e. almost instant response to
> ANY onstat command and straight in using dbaccess)
>
> I've attempted to put the machine name and IP address in the
> %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts directory but this doesn't
> appear to resolve the issue.
>
> I do remember something about Microsoft having a patch for NT on
> gethostbyname() procedure as this used to cause the same issue that
> I'm experiencing, but can't find anything useful on Microsoft's site
> re: W2K.
>
> Has anybody else experienced the same things? and if so, how did you
> get around (or resolve) them?
>
> As always, your help is very much appreciated.
>
> S.
>
> P.S. We also have an issue in not being able to get more than 25%
> utilisation of oninit.exe on all 4 multithreaded processors, no matter
> what we throw at it, but thats another issue... )


sending to informix-list
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 08:01 PM
Sean Kelsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Connection issues to IDS 9.3/9.4 on W2K

Authentication must be taking place on the server as the machine is in
a workgroup rather than in a domain. As for users, its a machine we're
using for environment testing so there must be only 10 users
configured (of which only 2 of us are performing tests).


"Murray Wood \(IList\)" <ifxmaillist@quanta.co.nz> wrote in message news:<blsssc$a9o$1@terabinaries.xmission.com>...
> Sean
>
> Where is authentication taking place? Is it local or on the PDC? How many
> users are in the Windows user table?
>
> MW
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org
> > [mailtowner-informix-list@iiug.org]On Behalf Of Sean Kelsey
> > Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2003 2:22 a.m.
> > To: informix-list@iiug.org
> > Subject: Connection issues to IDS 9.3/9.4 on W2K
> >
> >
> > Afternoon all
> >
> > IDS 9.30 & 9.40
> > Windows 2000 Advanced Server
> > Dell PowerEdge 2640 with 2 x Xeon 2.8Ghz processors multithreaded to 4
> > virtual processors (i.e. should be REALLY fast)
> >
> > Has anyone else experienced any latency issues (anywhere between 2-4
> > seconds) when performing dbaccess connections or simply performing
> > onstat commands??
> >
> > I have the same engine versions on a Windows 2000 Professional PC and
> > do NOT experience ANY latency issues (i.e. almost instant response to
> > ANY onstat command and straight in using dbaccess)
> >
> > I've attempted to put the machine name and IP address in the
> > %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts directory but this doesn't
> > appear to resolve the issue.
> >
> > I do remember something about Microsoft having a patch for NT on
> > gethostbyname() procedure as this used to cause the same issue that
> > I'm experiencing, but can't find anything useful on Microsoft's site
> > re: W2K.
> >
> > Has anybody else experienced the same things? and if so, how did you
> > get around (or resolve) them?
> >
> > As always, your help is very much appreciated.
> >
> > S.
> >
> > P.S. We also have an issue in not being able to get more than 25%
> > utilisation of oninit.exe on all 4 multithreaded processors, no matter
> > what we throw at it, but thats another issue... )

>
> sending to informix-list

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com