Unix Technical Forum

Re: IDS 10 erratic run times and slow ontape

This is a discussion on Re: IDS 10 erratic run times and slow ontape within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> It could impact the "KAIO disabled" performance which was mentioned in the backup and restore comments. --- scottishpoet <dryburghj@yahoo.com> ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Informix

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 10:16 AM
DL Redden
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IDS 10 erratic run times and slow ontape


It could impact the "KAIO disabled" performance which
was mentioned in the backup and restore comments.

--- scottishpoet <dryburghj@yahoo.com> wrote:

> if there is no performance problem (ie its not
> eratic) then i don't
> believechanging the AIO VPs will have any effect.
> Don't really want to
> make AIO eratic!
>
>
>
>
> TBP wrote:
> > Neil Truby wrote:
> > >>Neil Truby wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>"Neil Truby" <neil.truby@ardenta.com> wrote in

> message
> > >>>news:3polnvFbicgoU1@individual.net...
> > >>>
> > >>>>"Neil Truby" <neil.truby@ardenta.com> wrote in

> message
> > >>>>news:3pliprFb403pU1@individual.net...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>IDS 10.0FC3 on Solaris 2.9
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I conclude that our problem is with kaio and

> v10 at our installation.
> > >>>
> > >>>IBM case 439918 refers. We have been sent some

> tuning suggestions for
> > >>>the
> > >>>actual test. I am a little wary of this since

> the problem is not really
> > >>>that the test (CREATE CLUSTER INDEX) runs

> slowly all the time, but that
> > >>>it
> > >>>is sporadically slow with kaio enabled *only*.

> But more testing and more
> > >>>information certainly can't hurt ...
> > >>>
> > >>>In the meantime we've disabled kaio on the

> databse servers and discovered
> > >>>another problem. With kaio disabled the

> backups are perhaps 75% longer
> > >>>(35
> > >>>minutes instead of 20), but the *restore* runs

> 40 times more slowly (444
> > >>>pages/second without kaio ; 10093 with kaio,

> that is 7.5 hours vs 20 mins
> > >>>for the restore). A separate case, 439945,

> refers here.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "scottishpoet" <dryburghj@yahoo.com> wrote in

> message
> > >

>

news:1127748148.419479.255360@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> > >
> > >>if it only occurs with KIO turned on, you may

> want to discussed KIO
> > >>issues with OS vendor
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm. Interesting point. If it's confirmed as a

> problem with IDS v10 and
> > > kaio (it doesn't seem to be a problem with

> 9.40FC7), how am I - the poor,
> > > ignorant customer - to know if I should get help

> from the database vendor or
> > > the OS vendor?
> > >
> > >

> >
> > What have you got for :
> >
> > 1. NOAGE?
> >
> > i.e. when you have a "slow" run, what does ps

> -aldef show for the
> > oninit's priorities?
> >
> > 2. How many AIOVPs have you got?
> > i.e. Have you got enough when KAIO is disabled.

sending to informix-list
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com