Unix Technical Forum

Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints !

This is a discussion on Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints ! within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:47:35 +0200, "hobbes" <pasdespam@yahoo.fr> wrote: >Hi ! > >since my last post was answered ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Informix

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 06:21 PM
John Carlson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints !

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:47:35 +0200, "hobbes" <pasdespam@yahoo.fr>
wrote:

>Hi !
>
>since my last post was answered successfully , i try antoher one
>
>I want to know Index(es) and primary keys on specific tables.
>
>
>So i make a query between systables and sysindices.


This will give you the index name. Remember that if the unique index
doesn't exist when you generate the primary key constraint, Informix
will create one for you, as a combination of tabid and constrid. When
Informix does this for you, the first character if idxname will be
blank.

>
>But as i want to know if it is a primary key => I check the value of
>sysconstraints.constrtype.


Constrtype should be 'P'.

>When i try to make the link between => sysconstrints and sysindexes on
>idxname it does not work.
>
>The explanation:
>=============
>in fact idxname in sysconstraints is not always filled with the index name.
>sometimes it is fill with a value and sometimes not.(just blank)
>


On my version, when idxname isn't set, it is because constrtype is
'N', a not null constraint on a column. What is your Informix
version?

>for example with 2 tables:
>customer
>dealer
>
>they each have 1 PK and 1 IDX.
>
>The informations in sysconstraints are here , but
>=> for the table customer => i 've got the idxname filled. (so i can make
>difference between the idx and the PK)
>=> for the table customer => idxname not filled.....
>
>the tables have been created at the same time in the same script (with 250
>other tables which some have the sysconstraint.idxname information and other
>not)
>so, my question is ... why ?
>
>In fact is there a way to regenerate the idxname or am i doing somethig
>wrong ?


dbschema should allow you to see the index name, unless it is a
system-generated index name.
>
>Thank you by advance for any answers !
>
>Arnaud
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 06:21 PM
hobbes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints !

> This will give you the index name. Remember that if the unique index
> doesn't exist when you generate the primary key constraint, Informix
> will create one for you, as a combination of tabid and constrid. When
> Informix does this for you, the first character if idxname will be
> blank.


Yes that what i'm trying to get ...
in fact i want to obtain 3 things :
1)the index name,
2)the uniquess of the index
3)if the index is a primary key or not

> >When i try to make the link between => sysconstrints and sysindexes on
> >idxname it does not work.
> >
> >The explanation:
> >=============
> >in fact idxname in sysconstraints is not always filled with the index

name.
> >sometimes it is fill with a value and sometimes not.(just blank)
> >

>
> On my version, when idxname isn't set, it is because constrtype is
> 'N', a not null constraint on a column. What is your Informix
> version?


I use IDS 9.3 (i wait for the 9.4 ..... IBM seems on hollyday ...)
Something frightened me in your answer => 99% of our database is made with
not null constraint on columns.......
(i gonna try to find information about that)


Ok, thk you for the answer....

=======
=======

AND FINALLY .....
after checking my database creation script ....
i noticed one big (big, really ..... i can say huge) BUG.
My script is auto-generated from an Oracle database .....
and the generation of the primary key script is done randomly due to a
"poor" parameter...


so this time too , it's my fault.
I'm sorry....
thk you for the answer, it put me on the right way to find the issue.


Bye
Arnaud

Hope that the not null constraints isn't a limitation !


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 06:21 PM
John Carlson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints !

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:54:00 +0200, "hobbes" <pasdespam@yahoo.fr>
wrote:

>> This will give you the index name. Remember that if the unique index
>> doesn't exist when you generate the primary key constraint, Informix
>> will create one for you, as a combination of tabid and constrid. When
>> Informix does this for you, the first character if idxname will be
>> blank.

>
>Yes that what i'm trying to get ...
>in fact i want to obtain 3 things :
>1)the index name,
>2)the uniquess of the index
>3)if the index is a primary key or not



OK, I see now . . .

Join between sysindexes and sysconstraints would be tabid and idxname.
You could add constrtype = 'P' also

>
>> >When i try to make the link between => sysconstrints and sysindexes on
>> >idxname it does not work.
>> >
>> >The explanation:
>> >=============
>> >in fact idxname in sysconstraints is not always filled with the index

>name.
>> >sometimes it is fill with a value and sometimes not.(just blank)
>> >

>>
>> On my version, when idxname isn't set, it is because constrtype is
>> 'N', a not null constraint on a column. What is your Informix
>> version?

>
>I use IDS 9.3 (i wait for the 9.4 ..... IBM seems on hollyday ...)
>Something frightened me in your answer => 99% of our database is made with
>not null constraint on columns.......
>(i gonna try to find information about that)
>


Sounds like Lawson . . . . 8-)

You could isolate constraint type by using "constrtype = 'P'" as part
of your join. Shouldn't make any difference, since null constraints
do not have an associated index.
>
>Ok, thk you for the answer....
>
>=======
>=======
>
>AND FINALLY .....
>after checking my database creation script ....
>i noticed one big (big, really ..... i can say huge) BUG.
>My script is auto-generated from an Oracle database .....
>and the generation of the primary key script is done randomly due to a
>"poor" parameter...
>


Thus, the PKs were never created? That might cause a problem on the
Informix side if you're looking for primary keys that don't exist.
Informix is good, but not that good . . . .8-)

>
>so this time too , it's my fault.
>I'm sorry....
>thk you for the answer, it put me on the right way to find the issue.
>
>
>Bye
>Arnaud
>
>Hope that the not null constraints isn't a limitation !
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 06:21 PM
John Carlson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints !

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:48:19 +0200, "hobbes" <pasdespam@yahoo.fr>
wrote:

>> Join between sysindexes and sysconstraints would be tabid and idxname.
>> You could add constrtype = 'P' also

>
>That's ok... that's what i made and know all works fine.
>
>> >I use IDS 9.3 (i wait for the 9.4 ..... IBM seems on hollyday ...)
>> >Something frightened me in your answer => 99% of our database is made

>with
>> >not null constraint on columns.......
>> >(i gonna try to find information about that)
>> >

>>
>> Sounds like Lawson . . . . 8-)

>
>??
>i'm sure i'm missing something ...


Lawson is an ERP software package. Notorious for wide tables and an
upcoming lack of Informix / Sybase support . . . . (grrrrrrrrrrr)
>
>> You could isolate constraint type by using "constrtype = 'P'" as part
>> of your join. Shouldn't make any difference, since null constraints
>> do not have an associated index.

>
>yes, i think that will do the trick like that...
>
>
>> >AND FINALLY .....
>> >after checking my database creation script ....
>> >i noticed one big (big, really ..... i can say huge) BUG.
>> >My script is auto-generated from an Oracle database .....
>> >and the generation of the primary key script is done randomly due to a
>> >"poor" parameter...
>> >

>>
>> Thus, the PKs were never created? That might cause a problem on the
>> Informix side if you're looking for primary keys that don't exist.

>
>In fact i've got a first query that create a index unique on a column, then
>i "should" have altered it .....
>but some alter command have vanished .... (i got to rewrote our export
>program in a much cleaner way i think)
>
>> Informix is good, but not that good . . . .8-)

>
>huhu
>
>
>but just another question :
>does the index (not unique , not PK)
>are referenced in sysconstraints ?


No, only indices that are concerned with a constraint are listed in
sysconstraints. All indices are listed in sysindexes

>Do we have to see the name of the index in sysconstrainsts ?


Only if it ties to a constraint.

>(in idxname , or constrname)
>just for information, since i do not need this
>
>
>
>Thank you once again
>Arnaud
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 06:21 PM
Art S. Kagel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Index and Pk not referenced into syscontraints !

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 12:48:19 -0400, hobbes wrote:
<SNIP>

> but just another question :
> does the index (not unique , not PK)
> are referenced in sysconstraints ?
> Do we have to see the name of the index in sysconstrainsts ? (in idxname
> , or constrname)
> just for information, since i do not need this


All constraints which require an index (ie PK, FK, UNIQUE) will have the
index entered in the syscontraints, yes. Some constraints (Check, NOT
NULL) do not require an index and so the field is NULL.

Art S. Kagel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851