Serge Rielau wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>> Serge Rielau wrote:
>>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>>>> Anyway there are countless differences between Oracle SQL and
>>>>> PL/SQL in packages (and they drive me nuts on a daily basis).
>>>> Or would if you had Oracle installed eh. <g>
>>> Let the record show that I do not have Oracle installed.
>>
>> I knew that which is why I wanted to offer you an opportunity to clarify
>> anyone's misunderstanding.
>>
>>> e.g. is it true that BITAND really returns wrong results for NUMBERs
>>> bigger than max bigint?
>>
>> A search of the appropriate website shows no evidence that this is
>> correct in any version.
> Eh.. don't tell me YOU don't have have Oracle installed.
> I'm the one who has to look at websites, you can just try stuff ;-)
>
> Cheers
> Serge

I have website you don't [officially] have.

SAP had it for awhile but they got their hands slapped in public so I
expect you wouldn't want to be found there. ;-)
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

DA Morgan wrote:
> Serge Rielau wrote:
>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>> Serge Rielau wrote:
>>>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>>>>> Anyway there are countless differences between Oracle SQL and
>>>>>> PL/SQL in packages (and they drive me nuts on a daily basis).
>>>>> Or would if you had Oracle installed eh. <g>
>>>> Let the record show that I do not have Oracle installed.
>>>
>>> I knew that which is why I wanted to offer you an opportunity to clarify
>>> anyone's misunderstanding.
>>>
>>>> e.g. is it true that BITAND really returns wrong results for NUMBERs
>>>> bigger than max bigint?
>>>
>>> A search of the appropriate website shows no evidence that this is
>>> correct in any version.
>> Eh.. don't tell me YOU don't have have Oracle installed.
>> I'm the one who has to look at websites, you can just try stuff ;-)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Serge
>
> I have website you don't [officially] have.
>
> SAP had it for awhile but they got their hands slapped in public so I
> expect you wouldn't want to be found there. ;-)
Ok, you need to be patient here my Canadian English needs help and is
second hand to begin with.
You are trying to tell me that "I [Daniel] have [access to the metalink]
website, you [Serge] don't have [access]"
Correct. Please be aware that I have no telepathic abilities. I do not
know what you consider "relevant websites".
Could be psoug for all I know. :-)

Are you implying absence of bug-reports in metalink implies absence of
bugs in Oracle? It isn't a bug until Oracle says so? Now I start to
understand unbreakable!

Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

Serge Rielau wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>> Serge Rielau wrote:
>>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>>> Serge Rielau wrote:
>>>>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>>>>>> Anyway there are countless differences between Oracle SQL and
>>>>>>> PL/SQL in packages (and they drive me nuts on a daily basis).
>>>>>> Or would if you had Oracle installed eh. <g>
>>>>> Let the record show that I do not have Oracle installed.
>>>>
>>>> I knew that which is why I wanted to offer you an opportunity to
>>>> clarify
>>>> anyone's misunderstanding.
>>>>
>>>>> e.g. is it true that BITAND really returns wrong results for
>>>>> NUMBERs bigger than max bigint?
>>>>
>>>> A search of the appropriate website shows no evidence that this is
>>>> correct in any version.
>>> Eh.. don't tell me YOU don't have have Oracle installed.
>>> I'm the one who has to look at websites, you can just try stuff ;-)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Serge
>>
>> I have website you don't [officially] have.
>>
>> SAP had it for awhile but they got their hands slapped in public so I
>> expect you wouldn't want to be found there. ;-)
> Ok, you need to be patient here my Canadian English needs help and is
> second hand to begin with.
> You are trying to tell me that "I [Daniel] have [access to the metalink]
> website, you [Serge] don't have [access]"
> Correct. Please be aware that I have no telepathic abilities. I do not
> know what you consider "relevant websites".
> Could be psoug for all I know. :-)
>
> Are you implying absence of bug-reports in metalink implies absence of
> bugs in Oracle? It isn't a bug until Oracle says so? Now I start to
> understand unbreakable!
>
> Cheers
> Serge

I'm trying to say that an IBM employee named Serge is not accessing
metalink in an attempt to answer a question but I am. Clear enough? <g>
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)

DA Morgan wrote:
> I'm trying to say that an IBM employee named Serge is not accessing
> metalink in an attempt to answer a question but I am. Clear enough? <g>
Trust me I've plenty of lawyers keeping me on the straight and narrow.
There is no need for word games.
You have still not testes BITAND though ... (or you have and try to
derail the off-topic to off-off-topic.

Cheers
Serge

--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab

Serge Rielau wrote:
> DA Morgan wrote:
>> I'm trying to say that an IBM employee named Serge is not accessing
>> metalink in an attempt to answer a question but I am. Clear enough? <g>
> Trust me I've plenty of lawyers keeping me on the straight and narrow.
> There is no need for word games.
> You have still not testes BITAND though ... (or you have and try to
> derail the off-topic to off-off-topic.
>
> Cheers
> Serge

Too busy with 11g and my conference
http://www.psoug.org/oraday/schedule.html
Maybe after the conference ends if I don't take the boat out.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org