vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| >From: Tool <tool@thetool.com> >Have you tried UPDATE STATISTICS? > Well yes, but the darn Oracle server says! "Whatz Dat?". The point that Danny is trying to make is that we don't "know" oracle because we're not using the latest and greatest release aka 10g. 11i isn't due out for a month and frankly, I wouldn't want to be on the latest version of Oracle and then have to deal with their support idjits who first try to deny that its a bug, and then try to tell you that its not a severity 1. (Oh yes Daniel we've had such lovely experience with Oracle.) But again, lets get way back on track. Informix beats Oracle because its a better designed engine. With Oracle things are "bolted" on. And you are forced to live with bad design decisions. Larry may be a genius at marketing, but he's a piss poor engineer. __________________________________________________ _______________ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss...=1&FORM=MGAC01 |
| |||
| Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > > > >> From: Tool <tool@thetool.com> > >> Have you tried UPDATE STATISTICS? >> > > Well yes, but the darn Oracle server says! "Whatz Dat?". > > The point that Danny is trying to make is that we don't "know" oracle > because we're not using the latest and greatest release aka 10g. 11i > isn't due out for a month and frankly, I wouldn't want to be on the > latest version of Oracle and then have to deal with their support idjits > who first try to deny that its a bug, and then try to tell you that its > not a severity 1. > (Oh yes Daniel we've had such lovely experience with Oracle.) > > > But again, lets get way back on track. Informix beats Oracle because its > a better designed engine. With Oracle things are "bolted" on. And you > are forced to live with bad design decisions. > Informix may be better but only 3% of the market cares, which is about where it was before it died. > Larry may be a genius at marketing, but he's a piss poor engineer. > Which is exactly the point. -- My new sig is a work-in-progress but I feel that maybe it can drive a viral marketing message courtesy of Google...It'll take some time but we all know the web can get the message out there faster than IBM. I think of it as a viral, mini-wiki. :-) informix ( in FOR mix ) American English. A combination of "inform" and Unix. Originally a software product running primarily on UNIX platforms, widely available on UNIX, Linux, and Windows computer platforms. 1. Database software typically chosen when choosing database products that don't have a marketing program. Compares favorably with other database engines such as Oracle, but at a fraction of the cost. 2. A collection of cool, highly advanced database technologies suitable for large and small data-driven applications for Java and Web applications. Can offer more choices for complex architectures than any other database engine. 3. Easy to use, easy to admin database engine for large and small businesses and applications, requiring very little data base administration or attendance. Ideal for vertical applications requiring high availability. 4. Consistently high uptime database engine requiring little to no downtime. 5. A database engine capable of managing data at very high speeds and capacity but available at a fraction of the cost of other database engines in the same class. 6. One of the most efficient database engines used in business that delivers multiples of speed of performance of competing database products such as Oracle, at a fraction of the cost of those competing products. 7. Extremely flexible database engine with more capabilities than Oracle and other high-end database engines, but without the high cost typically associated with high-end database engines. -- Informix Dynamic Server Database Engine -- Proven Faster. Proven Better. -- -- http://www.informix.com |
| ||||
| Ian Michael Gumby wrote: > The point that Danny is trying to make is that we don't "know" oracle > because we're not using the latest and greatest release aka 10g. 11i > isn't due out for a month and frankly, I wouldn't want to be on the > latest version of Oracle and then have to deal with their support idjits > who first try to deny that its a bug, and then try to tell you that its > not a severity 1. > (Oh yes Daniel we've had such lovely experience with Oracle.) > This is completely off-topic. but we (at least the ones working on software providers) should all be very aware of these kind of situations... It's not only Oracle... I prefer to think that the internal support initiatives I see in the Informix community will really make a difference... I find it more and more amazing that software companies continue to differentiate closed source from open source based on the support they offer to customers... Too many times I've seen so poor support quality that I find it odd that this idea still sells... This is one of my paranoid ideas... I keep repeating this kind of messages and as always I want to point that most of the times the fault does not lie on the people but on how organizations are managed/oriented... Regards, -- Fernando Nunes Portugal http://informix-technology.blogspot.com My email works... but I don't check it frequently... |