This is a discussion on RE: Mirror or Raid1? Replication or DRBD? within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> I've always worked on the basis that OS or hardware mirroring ofers better performance than Informix mirroring, but at ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I've always worked on the basis that OS or hardware mirroring ofers better performance than Informix mirroring, but at the same time always set your dbspaces up with mirroring enables (1) but don't specify a mirrored chunk path. It takes no overhead and offers an alternative 'get-out' route (where you could add a mirror chunk) in the event of some problems. Keith -> -----Original Message----- -> From: disposablegarry@googlemail.com -> [mailto:disposablegarry@googlemail.com] -> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:20 AM -> To: informix-list@iiug.org -> Subject: Mirror or Raid1? Replication or DRBD? -> -> -> I'm currently installing a new system (obvious due to prior -> postings). -> It's running on a Linux-OS, and I'm using software RAID1 for data -> security. Question is: What's better performance-wise, to use the -> OS-level mirroring, or let Informix do the mirroring? -> -> Also, as our customer plans on running a second server as hot-standby -> machine, we will configure DRBD to update a filesystem area - what's -> better there, DRBD or using Informix' replication features? Both from -> performance and security/reliability point of view? (with more weight -> on reliability of course) -> -> Tnx! -> -> _______________________________________________ -> Informix-list mailing list -> Informix-list@iiug.org -> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list -> ************************************************** ********************************************* This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this messageis free from such problems. ************************************************** ********************************************* |