vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Captain Pedantic said: > > "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@serendipita.com> wrote in message > news:dluvrf$pdt$1@news.xmission.com... >> >> It's amazing what you can turn up on google: >> >> 'Daniel A. Morgan Jun 17 2001, 1:17 am >> Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server > >> So, I wonder who this nebbish is, and whether he's counting down the 206 >> days till IBM discontinues support for Informix as an independent >> product. >> >> Because he couldn't be wrong, now could he? > > He did actually say " ...is still being *marketed* ..." (my emphasis). > Also, it's actually 207 days until 17/06/2006. Well, duh! But he did say that it would already be over by the 17th, so the 16th is the last day for it to happen. So there. -- Bye now, Obnoxio "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ` dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche did i mention i like nulls? heck, i even go so far as to say that all columns in a table except the primary key could/should be nullable. this has certain advantages, for example, if you need to insert a child record and you don't have a parent row for it, just do an insert into the parent table with the primary key value (everything else null), and voila, relational integrity is preserved. but this is, admittedly, a bit controversial among modellers. --r937, dbforums.com sending to informix-list |