Unix Technical Forum

RE: WHY index can corrupted???

This is a discussion on RE: WHY index can corrupted??? within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPartTM-000-13b7e843-fa5d-4eeb-be8d-2cc75c3cb690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Art, Your comments on this? ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Informix

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 07:32 PM
Rastogi, Asheesh (Cognizant)
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: WHY index can corrupted???



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPartTM-000-13b7e843-fa5d-4eeb-be8d-2cc75c3cb690
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Art,
Your comments on this?

Cheers,
Asheesh.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Bankay [mailto:bobb@ssl.berkeley.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:48 AM
> To: informix-list@iiug.org
> Subject: Re: WHY index can corrupted???
>=20
>=20
> miyaki wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > OS : Sun Solaris 2.7
> > IDS : 7.31.UD5

> <snip>
> >=20
> > Anybody knows the reason that may cause the index
> > corruption???
> >=20
> > Appreciate for the comments.
> >=20
> > TIA,
> > MIyaki

>=20
> We use similar hardware and OS in a very high volume db=20
> application. We=20
> used caching RAID
> disk controllers that would corrupt data long after it had given IO=20
> complete to Solaris and Informix. So neither the OS nor the=20
> db engine=20
> had anyway to handle a hardware corruption at a later time. =20
> At the time=20
> we were using controllers with 128MB cache in RAID 1+0=20
> config. Somehow,=20
> the hardware would write corrupt data with correct parity, and the=20
> mirror manager would not know which image was correct. Hence index=20
> failures.
>=20
> Normally we would find out about corruption when doing backups. The=20
> only way to cure the problem was to get rid of the caching=20
> controllers.=20
> We now use RAID 5 which is slower but can self heal from intermittent=20
> disk failures. Thus, we have less performance but no more corruption=20
> for the past 2 years.
>=20
> Just one more experience.
>=20
> Bob B
>=20
>=20


------=_NextPartTM-000-13b7e843-fa5d-4eeb-be8d-2cc75c3cb690
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.

Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com


------=_NextPartTM-000-13b7e843-fa5d-4eeb-be8d-2cc75c3cb690--
sending to informix-list
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com