Ravi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can somebody please comment on this post ? It seems a genuine defect in
> IDS 9.30.HC2.

I've commented that (a) if your problem is valid, and I've no specific
reason to think otherwise (though I don't remember seeing a convincing
test case that demonstrates the problem), then yes, there is a problem
in the I4GL 7.30 and IDS 9.30 combination, but (b) both products are out
of date and any resolution is going to involve an upgrade. Have you
contacted IBM Tech Support yet, as I recommended?

--
Jonathan Leffler #include <disclaimer.h>
Email: jleffler@earthlink.net, jleffler@us.ibm.com
Guardian of DBD::Informix v2005.02 -- http://dbi.perl.org/