This is a discussion on CREATE INDEX parallel vs CREATE INDEX in sequence within the Ingres forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Hi all, I have a table with 6 382 316 tuples and 7 indexes, 2 K pages. Table is ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi all, I have a table with 6 382 316 tuples and 7 indexes, 2 K pages. Table is Heap. Ingres version is II 9.0.4 (a64.lnx/105)NPTL on RedHat. To rebuild indexes, I try two method : - "old school" : CREATE INDEX in sequence - "new style" : CREATE INDEX with parallel syntax Result : - CREATE INDEX in sequence : 17 min 18 sec - CREATE INDEX parallel : 1 h 6 min 57 sec It is the first time I test this technique with a large amount of data and previous tests (with max 1 000 000 tuples) did not show a so large difference. Parallel syntax is supposed faster, better, and so on. For information, partitionning the same table with 2 dimentions and 42 partitions take only 4 min 30 sec ... Do we miss something in the configuration or something else ? Who have experience to share ? Thank in advance, Jean-Pierre |