Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > Sun Solaris Hardware

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default Control device using TTL level signals

I want to control an electronic switch that needs a couple of TTL level
signals. It is possible to use a Sun for this? I was thinking about
programming the parallel port, which has in the past been used in PCs,
but I'm not sure how easy it is on a Suns - I have a feeling it is not
so easy.

Suns available include a SPARCstation 20, Ultra 60 and Netra T1. Speed
is not an issue and I dont mind sticking a transistor on the output if
needed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Cydrome Leader
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

Dave <someplace@nowhere-nice.com> wrote:
> I want to control an electronic switch that needs a couple of TTL level
> signals. It is possible to use a Sun for this? I was thinking about
> programming the parallel port, which has in the past been used in PCs,
> but I'm not sure how easy it is on a Suns - I have a feeling it is not
> so easy.
>
> Suns available include a SPARCstation 20, Ultra 60 and Netra T1. Speed
> is not an issue and I dont mind sticking a transistor on the output if
> needed.


sure. why not? Parallel is parallel, and can drive a transitor or even
better, an optoisolator, then your load.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

Cydrome Leader wrote:
> Dave <someplace@nowhere-nice.com> wrote:
>> I want to control an electronic switch that needs a couple of TTL level
>> signals. It is possible to use a Sun for this? I was thinking about
>> programming the parallel port, which has in the past been used in PCs,
>> but I'm not sure how easy it is on a Suns - I have a feeling it is not
>> so easy.
>>
>> Suns available include a SPARCstation 20, Ultra 60 and Netra T1. Speed
>> is not an issue and I dont mind sticking a transistor on the output if
>> needed.

>
> sure. why not? Parallel is parallel, and can drive a transitor or even
> better, an optoisolator, then your load.


The issue is how do I program the parallel port to give the outputs I
want? On a PC running DOS it was only necessary to write a byte of data
at whatever the IO port for LPT1 or LPT2 were. But on a multi-user
operating system like Solaris, it is certainly not going to be as easy -
no non-root user is going to be able to do it and it might not be too
easy for root to do (I have root access, so whether it needs root or not
is irrelevant to me, but I have no idea how to write the code to do this).

Anyone know what would be involved to write to the parallel port so I
can set the outputs to some precise values I want and keep them there
until I want to change them?

My guess is that this will be very difficult to do, but I don't know.

If anyone has any suggestions to how to get some TTL level signals from
a Sun I would be intersted. The Sun will have a GPIB board in it too,
but I cant find any cheap GPIB controlled switches.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Huge
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

On 2008-03-18, Dave <foo@coo.com> wrote:
> Cydrome Leader wrote:
>> Dave <someplace@nowhere-nice.com> wrote:
>>> I want to control an electronic switch that needs a couple of TTL level
>>> signals. It is possible to use a Sun for this? I was thinking about
>>> programming the parallel port, which has in the past been used in PCs,
>>> but I'm not sure how easy it is on a Suns - I have a feeling it is not
>>> so easy.
>>>
>>> Suns available include a SPARCstation 20, Ultra 60 and Netra T1. Speed
>>> is not an issue and I dont mind sticking a transistor on the output if
>>> needed.

>>
>> sure. why not? Parallel is parallel, and can drive a transitor or even
>> better, an optoisolator, then your load.

>
> The issue is how do I program the parallel port to give the outputs I
> want?


A Google for "Sun parallel port programming" yields many hits. )

Most of them talking about Java. (



--
"Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain
and presumptuous desire for a second one."
[email me at huge {at} huge (dot) org <dot> uk]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
msg
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

Dave wrote:

<snip>
> The issue is how do I program the parallel port to give the outputs I
> want? On a PC running DOS it was only necessary to write a byte of data
> at whatever the IO port for LPT1 or LPT2 were. But on a multi-user
> operating system like Solaris, it is certainly not going to be as easy -
> no non-root user is going to be able to do it and it might not be too
> easy for root to do (I have root access, so whether it needs root or not
> is irrelevant to me, but I have no idea how to write the code to do this).
>
> Anyone know what would be involved to write to the parallel port so I
> can set the outputs to some precise values I want and keep them there
> until I want to change them?
>


<snip>

At the risk of stating the obvious, why not browse the sources at
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xr...e/usr/src/uts/

-or-

Get clues from OpenBSD/FreeBSD/NetBSD sources.

This would be useful if you wished to add or modify a kernel driver.
Otherwise, take a look at 'lp' filters in any flavor of SVR4 to see
how folks talk to the parallel port. In most cases, it isn't very
complicated to talk to it. See also 'man -s 7 lp':

> The parallel printer adapters are character devices. The
> minor device number corresponds to the primary or secondary
> parallel printer adapter. Thus, minor device 0 corresponds
> to the primary parallel printer adapter, while minor device
> 1 corresponds to the secondary adapter.
>
> The parallel port behaves as described in termio (7).




Michael
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
DoN. Nichols
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

On 2008-03-18, Dave <foo@coo.com> wrote:
> Cydrome Leader wrote:


[ ... ]

>> sure. why not? Parallel is parallel, and can drive a transitor or even
>> better, an optoisolator, then your load.

>
> The issue is how do I program the parallel port to give the outputs I
> want? On a PC running DOS it was only necessary to write a byte of data
> at whatever the IO port for LPT1 or LPT2 were. But on a multi-user
> operating system like Solaris, it is certainly not going to be as easy -
> no non-root user is going to be able to do it and it might not be too
> easy for root to do (I have root access, so whether it needs root or not
> is irrelevant to me, but I have no idea how to write the code to do this).
>
> Anyone know what would be involved to write to the parallel port so I
> can set the outputs to some precise values I want and keep them there
> until I want to change them?


man bpp

man ecpp

Verify which is supported on your system.

and pay particular attention to the IOCTLs documented.

And as long as nothing else has to use that port, chown it to
belong to a process which your program runs as and you won't have to run
it as root.

Note that it will be a symlink to another /devices entry and
that will be the one which you will have to chown. Actually, by
default, mine is crw-rw-rw- so if you only need to access it, and don't
have to worry about others trying to access it and conflict with what
you are doing, you don't need to change anything.

FWWI Mine has /dev/ecpp0 and does not have /dev/bpp0

> My guess is that this will be very difficult to do, but I don't know.


Not that hard, once you learn to use IOCTLs.

> If anyone has any suggestions to how to get some TTL level signals from
> a Sun I would be intersted. The Sun will have a GPIB board in it too,
> but I cant find any cheap GPIB controlled switches.


You could also pick up one of the older serial port chips
(separate I/O buses and status bits) and send characters to it to set
particular bits high or low. If you need a lot of them, use the 8 bits
and decode them into 128 addresses and a bit for "set high" or "set
low".

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Peter J. Cherny
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

Also try "man bpp"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

DoN. Nichols wrote:

>> Anyone know what would be involved to write to the parallel port so I
>> can set the outputs to some precise values I want and keep them there
>> until I want to change them?

>
> man bpp
>
> man ecpp
>
> Verify which is supported on your system.
>
> and pay particular attention to the IOCTLs documented.


Thanks for that, although I still cant see how to do this from the ecpp
man page. There are plenty of structures defined in that man page, but I
don't see what actually writes the data. Perhaps I am being thick!

We eventually found on eBay a GPIB controlled relay (actually 6
reed-relays in a box) so bought a couple of them for $60 the pair. Since
GPIB is going to be used to set up some test equipment, having a GPIB
card is not excessive for this.

But I would like to know how to use the parallel port.

>
> And as long as nothing else has to use that port, chown it to
> belong to a process which your program runs as and you won't have to run
> it as root.


Cheers. Nothing else needs to use it. I'm basically setting up a couple
of Suns to just run the test equipment.

I just spent 15 minutes trying to understand why I could not read my
GPIB controlled DVM, only to realise I'd connected the GPIB cable on the
Sun, but did not connect the other end to the DVM! Once that was sorted
out, I can read the DVM ok from a simple C program.

> Note that it will be a symlink to another /devices entry and
> that will be the one which you will have to chown. Actually, by
> default, mine is crw-rw-rw- so if you only need to access it, and don't
> have to worry about others trying to access it and conflict with what
> you are doing, you don't need to change anything.
>
> FWWI Mine has /dev/ecpp0 and does not have /dev/bpp0


Same here - /dev/ecpp0 but no /dev/bpp0

I think I have a recollection that bpp0 is for older machines - I
suspect my SPARC 20 has that.

>
>> My guess is that this will be very difficult to do, but I don't know.

>
> Not that hard, once you learn to use IOCTLs.
>
>> If anyone has any suggestions to how to get some TTL level signals from
>> a Sun I would be intersted. The Sun will have a GPIB board in it too,
>> but I cant find any cheap GPIB controlled switches.

>
> You could also pick up one of the older serial port chips
> (separate I/O buses and status bits) and send characters to it to set
> particular bits high or low. If you need a lot of them, use the 8 bits
> and decode them into 128 addresses and a bit for "set high" or "set
> low".
>
> Enjoy,
> DoN.
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 12:41 PM
DoN. Nichols
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

On 2008-03-18, Dave <foo@coo.com> wrote:
> DoN. Nichols wrote:
>
>>> Anyone know what would be involved to write to the parallel port so I
>>> can set the outputs to some precise values I want and keep them there
>>> until I want to change them?

>>
>> man bpp
>>
>> man ecpp
>>
>> Verify which is supported on your system.
>>
>> and pay particular attention to the IOCTLs documented.

>
> Thanks for that, although I still cant see how to do this from the ecpp
> man page. There are plenty of structures defined in that man page, but I
> don't see what actually writes the data. Perhaps I am being thick!


I haven't done it (yet) but I suspect that the IOCTLs are used
to set up which pins are input and which are output (except when
connected to a scanner where they get switched to a direction
appropriate for the moment), and then you can just do plain writes to
the port with a mix of bits specifying which pins are to be high and
which to be low, and your program has to remember the status for any
pins which you are not currently changing so it gets written the same as
it was. When you read you probably only get data from the pins which
are defined as inputs, and it either returns only a default value
(perhaps zero, perhaps one) for the pins defined as outputs, or simply
lets you verify the state of the output pins on the read cycles.

> We eventually found on eBay a GPIB controlled relay (actually 6
> reed-relays in a box) so bought a couple of them for $60 the pair. Since
> GPIB is going to be used to set up some test equipment, having a GPIB
> card is not excessive for this.


O.K.

> But I would like to know how to use the parallel port.


Well ... you're going to have to do some work (or perhaps find
some perl libs for the purpose) since we have more than exhausted my own
knowledge of the matter -- mostly going by memories of how the Motorola
6820 chips were used on my earlier systems and applying it to the IOCTLs
which are present in the system. Often, BTW, you'll find a lot more
useful information by reading the header files somewhere in the
/usr/include tree. A quick find run turns up four files to examine:

================================================== ====================
23:17:47 > find /usr/include -name ecpp\* -print
/usr/include/sys/ecppio.h
/usr/include/sys/ecppreg.h
/usr/include/sys/ecppsys.h
/usr/include/sys/ecppvar.h
================================================== ====================

>> And as long as nothing else has to use that port, chown it to
>> belong to a process which your program runs as and you won't have to run
>> it as root.

>
> Cheers. Nothing else needs to use it. I'm basically setting up a couple
> of Suns to just run the test equipment.
>
> I just spent 15 minutes trying to understand why I could not read my
> GPIB controlled DVM, only to realise I'd connected the GPIB cable on the
> Sun, but did not connect the other end to the DVM! Once that was sorted
> out, I can read the DVM ok from a simple C program.


:-)

What flavor of GPIB card -- sBus or PCI? I've got three sBus cards, but
can't afford the drivers from National Instruments. They are really in
love with those drivers -- they cost almost as much as the driver plus a
card together from them. :-)

>> Note that it will be a symlink to another /devices entry and
>> that will be the one which you will have to chown. Actually, by
>> default, mine is crw-rw-rw- so if you only need to access it, and don't
>> have to worry about others trying to access it and conflict with what
>> you are doing, you don't need to change anything.
>>
>> FWWI Mine has /dev/ecpp0 and does not have /dev/bpp0

>
> Same here - /dev/ecpp0 but no /dev/bpp0
>
> I think I have a recollection that bpp0 is for older machines - I
> suspect my SPARC 20 has that.


I've just checked, and one of my SS-5s running Solaris 2.6 has
that one. The other was on a Sun Blade 1000 -- somewhat newer and
faster. :-)

Enjoy,
DoN.

P.S. I appear to have you killfiled in rec.crafts.metalworking, but
I can't remember why, so I wasn't sure whether to reply or not.
:-)

--
Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 04:31 AM
ChrisQuayle
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Control device using TTL level signals

Dave wrote:
> I want to control an electronic switch that needs a couple of TTL level
> signals. It is possible to use a Sun for this? I was thinking about
> programming the parallel port, which has in the past been used in PCs,
> but I'm not sure how easy it is on a Suns - I have a feeling it is not
> so easy.
>
> Suns available include a SPARCstation 20, Ultra 60 and Netra T1. Speed
> is not an issue and I dont mind sticking a transistor on the output if
> needed.


Dave,

As this is a standard Solaris device, the first place to look is the man
page for an open() and associated syscalls.

Assuming that it hasn't been locked by another process (print q,
whatever), you should be able to do an open() for a write, then write
single bytes to the port. Probably neeed get and set attributes calls as
well, to ensure you get raw data and no filtering. Keep a local copy of
the current value in your program. 'And' or 'or' to the local copy to
set or clear bits, then do a write to the port each time you change the
value. You may or may not get the printer strobe pulse as well, which
could be uesfull if you want to latch the data externally. It's easy to
test this by wiring 8 leds and series resistors across the port lines
and gnd to verify that the bits do in fact get set or cleared.

In short, just experiment - you are unlikely to do any damage to
anything and should only take a few 10's of minutes to write a quick
test program.

The best book for all this stuff is Stevens, "Advanced Programming in
the Unix Environment" - well worth the cost and probably cheap s/h on
ABE or Amazon...

Chris

----------------------
Greenfield Designs Ltd
Electronic and Embedded System Design
Oxford, England
(44) 1865 750 681
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699