Unix Technical Forum

Lowest power CPU for an SS20

This is a discussion on Lowest power CPU for an SS20 within the Sun Solaris Hardware forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Does anyone know what CPU that fits in the SPARC 20 uses the least power? Does that significantly effect ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > Sun Solaris Hardware

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 11:32 AM
Dr. David Kirkby
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lowest power CPU for an SS20

Does anyone know what CPU that fits in the SPARC 20 uses the least
power? Does that significantly effect power consumption from the mains
supply? I'm looking to run an SS20 for a task that will require
minimal CPU restorces, yet will need to be on 24/7. For obvious
reasons I don't want it using loads of power. At the minute I have two
machines configured (which we just taken from the top of a pile of 5
SS20's I have) both of which have dual CPUs in them - one 2x75, the
other 2x125. Clearly that's not an ideal solution, but was wondering
about the other CPUs. I have an SM61 somewhere hear. Is there anything
likely to use significantly less power than that, or would I be saving
myself next to nothing by using another CPU. I don't want to spend $$
on a CPU and carriage if it won't bring any significant benefits.

Dr. David Kirkby
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 11:32 AM
Rich Teer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lowest power CPU for an SS20

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:

> Does anyone know what CPU that fits in the SPARC 20 uses the least
> power? Does that significantly effect power consumption from the mains
> supply? I'm looking to run an SS20 for a task that will require
> minimal CPU restorces, yet will need to be on 24/7. For obvious
> reasons I don't want it using loads of power. At the minute I have two
> machines configured (which we just taken from the top of a pile of 5
> SS20's I have) both of which have dual CPUs in them - one 2x75, the
> other 2x125. Clearly that's not an ideal solution, but was wondering
> about the other CPUs. I have an SM61 somewhere hear. Is there anything
> likely to use significantly less power than that, or would I be saving
> myself next to nothing by using another CPU. I don't want to spend $$
> on a CPU and carriage if it won't bring any significant benefits.


I don't think the CPU will have a non-negligible effect on the
total power consumption, but I guess if you want to minimise it,
go for a low speed CPU with no E$. But I suspect we're talking
less than 1W difference...

--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA

President,
Rite Online Inc.

Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-online.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 11:35 AM
Andrew Tyson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lowest power CPU for an SS20

I suspect that the consumption of a CPU will be considerably
less than the disk(s) installed on the SS20, especially if they're
older drives.

Andrew


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com