This is a discussion on S2500 vs. SB1000 within the Sun Solaris Hardware forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Erik Magnuson <erik@cts.com> writes: > > My pleasure, I hope to post some more benchmark results. I might get ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Erik Magnuson <erik@cts.com> writes: > > My pleasure, I hope to post some more benchmark results. I might get > > forte 8 soon. > > Will look forward to seeing them. I'd also be curious as to how well the > power saving via frequency switching works on the SB-2500. IIRC, the > US-IIIi is supposed to switch between full, 1/2 and 1/32 speed. More info on the SB2500 :- Not exactly a benchmark, and certainly not scientific, but this morning I installed Rational/IBM "PurifyPlus" and ran my appplication through purify. For those not familiar, this tool instruments object code with memory watching instrumentation for errors like "uninitialised memory read" "array bounds read" and so on and so forth. I consider the tool essential for C++ development. Anyway, I'm happy to say that the SB2500 is "wicked fast" at this particular job. My perception is that the improvement is better than the raw clock speed increase over my previous dev machien (SB1000 750mhz). Could be due to improved (lower) main memory latency and much fast 2nd-level cache. Whatever the reason, I'll take it! Chris -- Chris Morgan "Post posting of policy changes by the boss will result in real rule revisions that are irreversible" - anonymous correspondent |