vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| A while back I picked up a Sparcserver 670MP. I had no idea if it worked or not, but it was free so that wasn't much of a turnoff. It sat idle for a while until I picked up a framebuffer card, and it fired up and tested the memory without issue. Now that I know that the thing works I want to go about getting some hard disks in it and getting the old beast up and running, but I'm unable to find a free (beer or speech) operating system that completely supports the machine. As far as I know Linux supports SMP but not the VME bus. NetBSD and OpenBSD supports the VME bus but not SMP. Any suggestions? |
| |||
| On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Enoch Zembecowicz wrote: > Any suggestions? Solaris 2.5.1 HW 11/97 is your best bet. It was the last release of Solaris to support those old machines. -- Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net |
| |||
| On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:27:30 +0000, Rich Teer wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Enoch Zembecowicz wrote: > >> Any suggestions? > > Solaris 2.5.1 HW 11/97 is your best bet. It was the last > release of Solaris to support those old machines. Thanks for the info Rich. Do you know if Sun has a program to give free/reduced cost licenses of their old OS'es to hobbyists/students? |
| |||
| On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Enoch Zembecowicz wrote: > Thanks for the info Rich. > Do you know if Sun has a program to give free/reduced cost licenses of > their old OS'es to hobbyists/students? The Solaris license is free for hobbyists students, but even if it weren't I can tell you now (although IANAL and don't speak for Sun) that Sun aren't going to try to scare a license fee from you for this ancient stuff! The hardest job will be finding a suitable media kit. For that, Ebay is your best bet. HTH, -- Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net |
| |||
| If anyone reading has a media kit that they'd be willing to copy I would gladly pay for the cost of media and shipping. On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:13:43 +0000, Rich Teer wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Enoch Zembecowicz wrote: > >> Thanks for the info Rich. >> Do you know if Sun has a program to give free/reduced cost licenses of >> their old OS'es to hobbyists/students? > > The Solaris license is free for hobbyists students, but > even if it weren't I can tell you now (although IANAL > and don't speak for Sun) that Sun aren't going to try > to scare a license fee from you for this ancient stuff! > > The hardest job will be finding a suitable media kit. > For that, Ebay is your best bet. > > HTH, |
| |||
| Enoch Zembecowicz wrote: >If anyone reading has a media kit that they'd be willing to copy I would >gladly pay for the cost of media and shipping. >On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:13:43 >+0000, Rich Teer wrote: > It would be helpful (at least to me) if you said where you were located. Bill K7NOM > > > >>On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Enoch Zembecowicz wrote: >> >> >> >>>Thanks for the info Rich. >>>Do you know if Sun has a program to give free/reduced cost licenses of >>>their old OS'es to hobbyists/students? >>> >>> >>The Solaris license is free for hobbyists students, but >>even if it weren't I can tell you now (although IANAL >>and don't speak for Sun) that Sun aren't going to try >>to scare a license fee from you for this ancient stuff! >> >>The hardest job will be finding a suitable media kit. >>For that, Ebay is your best bet. >> >>HTH, >> >> > > > |
| |||
| Enoch Zembecowicz <enoch@zembecowicz.org> writes: >A while back I picked up a Sparcserver 670MP. I had no idea if it worked >or not, but it was free so that wasn't much of a turnoff. It sat idle for >a while until I picked up a framebuffer card, and it fired up and tested >the memory without issue. >Now that I know that the thing works I want to go about getting some hard >disks in it and getting the old beast up and running, but I'm unable to >find a free (beer or speech) operating system that completely supports the >machine. As far as I know Linux supports SMP but not the VME bus. NetBSD >and OpenBSD supports the VME bus but not SMP. >Any suggestions? I'm about to attempt getting Gentoo Linux running on my SS600 system. My machine is an SS600 system board mounted in an old Sun 3/110 3-slot SunVME enclosure which has the floor-standing tower kit fitted. Makes for a really neat machine. The question will be just how well Gentoo Linux supports the devices on the system board... Anyone have any experience with Gentoo on the SS600MP platform? Craig. -- SUN RIPENED KERNELS - Surplus Sun Microsystems Equipment, Parts + Accessories Waterfall, NSW, Australia - Operated by Craig Dewick - Founded in 1996 Main site: www.sunrk.com.au - Ebay Shop: www.ebayshops.com.au/sunripenedkernels Ph: +612-9520-2547 - Fax: +612-9520-2557 - Mobile: 04-2163-0547 (int. +614) |
| |||
| >>A while back I picked up a Sparcserver 670MP. I had no idea if it worked >>or not, but it was free so that wasn't much of a turnoff. It sat idle for >>a while until I picked up a framebuffer card, and it fired up and tested >>the memory without issue. >>Now that I know that the thing works I want to go about getting some hard >>disks in it and getting the old beast up and running, but I'm unable to >>find a free (beer or speech) operating system that completely supports the >>machine. As far as I know Linux supports SMP but not the VME bus. NetBSD >>and OpenBSD supports the VME bus but not SMP. >>Any suggestions? Actually, you can run Solaris 8 (maybe even 9) on a SPARCserver 670MP, provided that your MBUS CPU modules are still supported (it's the same type of modules used in the SS10/SS20/SS1000/SS2000). However, you won't get VME support (that's ok, the 600-series also has SBus, and I doubt you'll run across any VME cards you really need anyways). Basically, you just have to hack the kernel to disable a section that essentially says "If this is a 600MP series machine, don't boot". In reality, the 600MP series is just a sun4m /w VME slots. So Solaris 8 will work just fine, albeit without VME support. http://lios.apana.org.au/~cdewick/su...sunos_6x0.html (these instructions are for Solaris 2.6, but I've used them (albiet with some poking around, as the addresses in the 8 kernel are different) to successfully hack a Solaris 8 kernel) However, as this involves a kernel hack, the actual installation isn't as straightforward anymore. You basically have to either swap out the kernel on the install CD (i.e. modify the ISO), or do a network install (where it is easy to change anything). -Derek Konigsberg <octo@logicprobe.org> |
| |||
| On Wednesday 25 February 2004 10:41 pm in comp.sys.sun.admin Derek Konigsberg wrote: >>>A while back I picked up a Sparcserver 670MP. I had no idea if it worked >>>or not, but it was free so that wasn't much of a turnoff. It sat idle >>>for a while until I picked up a framebuffer card, and it fired up and >>>tested the memory without issue. >>>Now that I know that the thing works I want to go about getting some hard >>>disks in it and getting the old beast up and running, but I'm unable to >>>find a free (beer or speech) operating system that completely supports >>>the >>>machine. As far as I know Linux supports SMP but not the VME bus. >>>NetBSD and OpenBSD supports the VME bus but not SMP. >>>Any suggestions? > > Actually, you can run Solaris 8 (maybe even 9) on a SPARCserver 670MP, > provided that your MBUS CPU modules are still supported (it's the same > type > of modules used in the SS10/SS20/SS1000/SS2000). However, you won't get > VME support (that's ok, the 600-series also has SBus, and I doubt you'll > run across any VME cards you really need anyways). Basically, you just > have to hack the kernel to disable a section that essentially says "If > this > is a 600MP series machine, don't boot". In reality, the 600MP series is > just a sun4m /w VME slots. So Solaris 8 will work just fine, albeit > without VME support. > > http://lios.apana.org.au/~cdewick/su...sunos_6x0.html > (these instructions are for Solaris 2.6, but I've used them (albiet with > some poking around, as the addresses in the 8 kernel are different) to > successfully hack a Solaris 8 kernel) It is rather simpler to use Solaris 2.5.1 which was the last to properly support these machines. -- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text. |
| ||||
| Chris Newport wrote: >On Wednesday 25 February 2004 10:41 pm in comp.sys.sun.admin Derek >Konigsberg wrote: > > > >>>>A while back I picked up a Sparcserver 670MP. I had no idea if it worked >>>>or not, but it was free so that wasn't much of a turnoff. It sat idle >>>>for a while until I picked up a framebuffer card, and it fired up and >>>>tested the memory without issue. >>>>Now that I know that the thing works I want to go about getting some hard >>>>disks in it and getting the old beast up and running, but I'm unable to >>>>find a free (beer or speech) operating system that completely supports >>>>the >>>>machine. As far as I know Linux supports SMP but not the VME bus. >>>>NetBSD and OpenBSD supports the VME bus but not SMP. >>>>Any suggestions? >>>> >>>> >>Actually, you can run Solaris 8 (maybe even 9) on a SPARCserver 670MP, >>provided that your MBUS CPU modules are still supported (it's the same >>type >>of modules used in the SS10/SS20/SS1000/SS2000). However, you won't get >>VME support (that's ok, the 600-series also has SBus, and I doubt you'll >>run across any VME cards you really need anyways). Basically, you just >>have to hack the kernel to disable a section that essentially says "If >>this >>is a 600MP series machine, don't boot". In reality, the 600MP series is >>just a sun4m /w VME slots. So Solaris 8 will work just fine, albeit >>without VME support. >> >>http://lios.apana.org.au/~cdewick/su...sunos_6x0.html >>(these instructions are for Solaris 2.6, but I've used them (albiet with >>some poking around, as the addresses in the 8 kernel are different) to >>successfully hack a Solaris 8 kernel) >> >> > >It is rather simpler to use Solaris 2.5.1 which was the last to >properly support these machines. > > > If the original poster would say if the machine ; a: Is in the USA b; Does the machine have a tape drive c: Does the machine have a CD reader. I might have a copy of 2.5.1 that it could use. Don't want the hassle of shipping to other countries Bill K7NOM |