vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Ome Ernst wrote: > Hello All, > > Maybe the silliest question this newsgroup has ever seen,because this > machine > wasn't developed for a task like this but would anyone know how Seti would > run on a Sparcserver 1000 8x85 MHz, 2 GB RAM ? > > Ernst - Jan > > > > It will simultaneously run 8 seti jobs *really* slow. Elias |
| |||
| Ome Ernst <e-j_oey@zonnet.nl> wrote: > wasn't developed for a task like this but would anyone know how Seti would > run on a Sparcserver 1000 8x85 MHz, 2 GB RAM ? Slowly. Very slowly. The SS1000 is roughly a 10 year old machine. Enough said? Scott |
| |||
| On Sunday 01 February 2004 8:27 am in comp.sys.sun.hardware Scott Howard wrote: > Ome Ernst <e-j_oey@zonnet.nl> wrote: >> wasn't developed for a task like this but would anyone know how Seti >> would run on a Sparcserver 1000 8x85 MHz, 2 GB RAM ? > > Slowly. Very slowly. > > The SS1000 is roughly a 10 year old machine. Enough said? Drifting slightly of topic :- Does anyone know where to find documentation on the internals of the SS1000 and other Sun4d systems. The Sparc Linux kernel team do not have any documentation on low level stuff such as programming the internal bus, so Linux can only use one processor without barfing. Other Sun architectures are reasonably well documented but information on Sun4d seems to be rather elusive. -- My real address is crn (at) netunix (dot) com WARNING all messages containing attachments or html will be silently deleted. Send only plain text. |
| ||||
| Elias wrote: > > It will simultaneously run 8 seti jobs *really* slow. > > Elias For a short while I ran 3.03 on a SparcStation 5, 85MHz that took 5 days per work unit. I suppose an SS1000 would be similar, maybe on average producing one work unit every 15-20 hours. This is almost the same as a single 400-500MHz Celeron, at 8 times the electricity cost. Alex. |