This is a discussion on "Type A" Math Coprocessors within the Sun Solaris Hardware forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Hi all, I have a client who is looking to purchase a Sun Blade 2000 workstaion (not to be ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi all, I have a client who is looking to purchase a Sun Blade 2000 workstaion (not to be confused with the B100 Bladeserver), dual CPU. He wants one CPU to be the UltraSPARC III Cu @ 1.2 GHz, while the other he was wanting to be something more "mathematically inclined", citing a 'Type-A' math co-processor. This is a little beyond my tech experitse. In general, I am unclear as to how a UltraSPARC might differ from an SGI MIPS CPU in terms of mathematical computation. In light of that, is there a Sun CPU that fits the bill? In addition, if there is a solution, can one pair it up with a 'normal' Ultra SPARC III Cu?? TIA! McNeedo |
| |||
| McNeedo wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a client who is looking to purchase a Sun Blade 2000 workstaion > (not to be confused with the B100 Bladeserver), dual CPU. > > He wants one CPU to be the UltraSPARC III Cu @ 1.2 GHz, while the > other he was wanting to be something more "mathematically inclined", > citing a 'Type-A' math co-processor. > > This is a little beyond my tech experitse. In general, I am unclear > as to how a UltraSPARC might differ from an SGI MIPS CPU in terms of > mathematical computation. In light of that, is there a Sun CPU that > fits the bill? In addition, if there is a solution, can one pair it > up with a 'normal' Ultra SPARC III Cu?? > > TIA! > > McNeedo Is he talking about the chip's personality? I.e. aggressive? |
| |||
| In article <da018a1a.0309110906.9d2c3ab@posting.google.com> , mcneedo@hotmail.com (McNeedo) wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a client who is looking to purchase a Sun Blade 2000 workstaion > (not to be confused with the B100 Bladeserver), dual CPU. > > He wants one CPU to be the UltraSPARC III Cu @ 1.2 GHz, while the > other he was wanting to be something more "mathematically inclined", > citing a 'Type-A' math co-processor. A what? Either this client knows about some sort of experimental or super- secret gadget, or (my guess) he was too busy reading Computerworld and got the wrong mix into his pipe. I never heard of any such thing, myself. Karl |