SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
01-16-2008, 12:53 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: U5 vs. divX4 x-no-archive: yes Levente KOVACS wrote: > Hi folks, > > > I have got a U5 lately. It has a 270MHz CPU and 192Mb RAM inside. Do I > have a chance to play DivX4 movies with it? I'm plenning to use > mplayer... > > > All the best: Levente Not sure that'll be powerful enough, cpu-wise, but you can convert divx4 to regular mpeg-1 and THEN play it... -- Please keep the 'x-no-archive: yes' header. To reach me by email: transform my account name like IBM -> HAL.      |
|
01-16-2008, 12:53 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: U5 vs. divX4 Levente KOVACS wrote: > Hi folks, > > > I have got a U5 lately. It has a 270MHz CPU and 192Mb RAM inside. Do I > have a chance to play DivX4 movies with it? I'm plenning to use > mplayer... It depends very much on 1) how optimized the mplayer code is for the SPARC and 2) how well your graphics device and its drivers handles video. I think a UltraSPARC at 270 is about as fast as a Celeron 366 mhz and i have played DivX on such a CPU without problems (mplayer & linux). -- Lasse Jensen [fafler at linuxmail dot org] |
|
01-16-2008, 12:54 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: U5 vs. divX4 Lasse Jensen wrote in comp.sys.sun.hardware: > Levente KOVACS wrote: > > > I have got a U5 lately. It has a 270MHz CPU and 192Mb RAM inside. Do I > > have a chance to play DivX4 movies with it? I'm plenning to use > > mplayer... > > It depends very much on 1) how optimized the mplayer code is for the SPARC > and 2) how well your graphics device and its drivers handles video. takes advantages of VIS extensions, but mLib must be installed. > I think a UltraSPARC at 270 is about as fast as a Celeron 366 mhz and i > have played DivX on such a CPU without problems (mplayer & linux). me too. but on sparc/solaris you cannot use for example the essential codecs pack. -- yyaazz [PARENTAL ADVISORY explicit content] |
Linear Mode
