vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I have an old Enterprise 3000 with two 250MHz UltraSPARC II processors. Now I'll get two Sun UltraSPARC II 400MHz CPU modules with 8MB Cache (P/N 501-5661). Will these run in the E3000? Do they require any certain firmware and/or board revisions? Benjamin |
| |||
| In article <bkvhsj$6l54u$1@ID-22005.news.uni-berlin.de>, Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote: >I have an old Enterprise 3000 with two 250MHz UltraSPARC II processors. Now >I'll get two Sun UltraSPARC II 400MHz CPU modules with 8MB Cache (P/N >501-5661). Will these run in the E3000? Do they require any certain firmware >and/or board revisions? Yes, Are you adding a CPU board or will you switch CPU:s? You need clock board 501-5365 to provide a 5x (5x84=400MHz) frequency. Update to latest prom patch before installing them. If you have cpu-board 501-2976 only 2MB cache will be used (X2600A), if you have X2601A or X2602A cpu-boards all 8MB will be seen. If you have older clock board than 501-5365 the cpu:s will be recognized as 336MHz I believe. /wfr Fredrik courtesy of sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub -- Fredrik Lundholm dol @ ce.chalmers.se |
| |||
| > Are you adding a CPU board or will you switch CPU:s? > You need clock board 501-5365 to provide a 5x (5x84=400MHz) frequency. > Update to latest prom patch before installing them. > If you have cpu-board 501-2976 only 2MB cache will be used (X2600A), > if you have X2601A or X2602A cpu-boards all 8MB will be seen. > If you have older clock board than 501-5365 the cpu:s will be > recognized as 336MHz I believe. I had a Sun E3000 with the following spec: 1x501-2975 clock board 3x501-2976 CPU/memory boards 6x501-5235 400 MHz / 8MB cache CPUs In this configuration (i.e. with the slow clock board) the CPUs ran at 336MHz. The clock board was then upgraded to 501-5365 and they now run at 400 MHz. I'm a little concerned about the cache size though - prtdiag -v shows 8MB cache per module but the sunsolve page indicates only 2MB will be used - is this the case? Many Thanks, James |
| |||
| Fredrik Lundholm wrote: > Are you adding a CPU board or will you switch CPU:s? I want to switch. The E3000 currently has two 167MHz 1MB Cache CPU's on a 501-2976 CPU Board, so I will have the 2MB cache problem. But I have an 501-4286 clock board from which Sun says it's a 83/100MHz clock ("Clock 501-4286 supports 167, 250, 336, and 400MHz modules"), so hopefully I'm at least fine with that. I'll post my results as soon as I receive the CPU's. Thanks for the help! Benjamin |
| |||
| In article <bl1g7p$75vp9$1@ID-22005.news.uni-berlin.de>, Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote: >501-2976 CPU Board, so I will have the 2MB cache problem. But I have an >501-4286 clock board from which Sun says it's a 83/100MHz clock ("Clock >501-4286 supports 167, 250, 336, and 400MHz modules"), so hopefully I'm at >least fine with that. I'll post my results as soon as I receive the CPU's. Actually you would be fine on a E3500 with 100MHz bus. But with a 83MHz bus you really need the 5x multiplier! But we'll see! A clock board is usually really cheap. /wfr Fredrik -- Fredrik Lundholm dol @ ce.chalmers.se |
| |||
| Fredrik Lundholm wrote: >> 501-2976 CPU Board, so I will have the 2MB cache problem. But I have >> an 501-4286 clock board from which Sun says it's a 83/100MHz clock >> ("Clock 501-4286 supports 167, 250, 336, and 400MHz modules"), so >> hopefully I'm at least fine with that. I'll post my results as soon >> as I receive the CPU's. > > Actually you would be fine on a E3500 with 100MHz bus. But with a > 83MHz bus you really need the 5x multiplier! But we'll see! A clock > board is usually really cheap. Hmm, from what I found out until now my clock board is 100MHz safe, but my I/O board and my CPU board are not. Seems I have to replace the CPU board simply because of the cache issue so I can get a 100MHz one, so I need a 100MHz CPU board and a 100MHz I/O+ Board. Do You have an idea how much I should pay for such boards in Europe? But then, even at 336MHz the CPU's are much better than the 167MHz USI I have currently... Benjamin |
| |||
| > Seems I have to replace the CPU board simply because of the cache issue > so I can get a 100MHz one, so I need a 100MHz CPU board and a > 100MHz I/O+ Board. Do You have an idea how much I should pay for > such boards in Europe? Last time I looked the cheapest I found was about $1000 ea. Can anyone confirm the cache limitation is an issue? I've just run a bunch of tests on my E3k with 400 MHz/8MB CPUs and the 501-2976 board and as far as I can tell, all 8MB is being used, Thanks, James |
| |||
| James Srinivasan wrote: > Last time I looked the cheapest I found was about $1000 ea. Oops, that's more than the whole system is worth... > Can anyone confirm the cache limitation is an issue? I've just run a > bunch of tests on my E3k with 400 MHz/8MB CPUs and the 501-2976 board > and as far as I can tell, all 8MB is being used, Hmm, when I get my CPU's I'll check that. I wouldn't be too unhappy with only 4MB _if_ the system otherwise runs fine. How did You check the cache size? Benjamin |
| |||
| Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote: > Hmm, from what I found out until now my clock board is 100MHz safe, but my > I/O board and my CPU board are not. Seems I have to replace the CPU board > simply because of the cache issue so I can get a 100MHz one, so I need a > 100MHz CPU board and a 100MHz I/O+ Board. Do You have an idea how much I > should pay for such boards in Europe? Forget 100Mhz - your E3000 backplane only supports up to 83Mhz. What you need (as someone else suggested) is a 5:1 clock-board. Using this the backplane, all CPU boards and all IO boards run at 80Mhz, and the CPUs run at 5x the bus speed, or 400Mhz. Scott |