This is a discussion on X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ??? within the Sun Solaris Hardware forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Hello list, Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get Remote Console to work. I ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello list, Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot, etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct screen. But running the Remote Console application gives nothing (white screen). Tried Mozilla & Safari on Max OS.X and IE6 on Windows 2003. First ones gives white screen, second one ditto and hangs up the IE window. I see no traffic flowing but 2 TCP sessions open on ports 443 and 8600. Shouldn't there be more? |
| |||
| Welll, I sort'a fixed it. For some obscure reason the X2100M2 ILO will not run when placed behind a Cisco PIX firewall, even when the firewall is permitting all ports & traffic in and out. Very strange and not really what I was expecting. The X4100 ILO runs great, even using NAT on that... mousehouse wrote: > Hello list, > > Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get > Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot, > etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct screen. But > running the Remote Console application gives nothing (white screen). > > Tried Mozilla & Safari on Max OS.X and IE6 on Windows 2003. First ones > gives white screen, second one ditto and hangs up the IE window. > > I see no traffic flowing but 2 TCP sessions open on ports 443 and 8600. > Shouldn't there be more? |
| ||||
| Does the ILO (I guess this is the name for the console app?) use UDP or TCP? If TCP, I wouldn't expect a problem but if UDP, it might be the case that instead of sending MTU-sized packets, it sends larger packets as fragments. TCP shouldn't do this because packet size should simply be limited by MSS/MTU. The problem with fragmented packets and firewall is that Linux, which I am just assuming is the OS for the ILO, sends fragments backwards -- last fragment first -- as an optimization. This breaks stateful firewalls, which includes NAT even without any firewall rules. -frank On 11 Oct 2006 11:10:12 -0700 "mousehouse" <rutger.bevaart@gmail.com> wrote: > Welll, I sort'a fixed it. For some obscure reason the X2100M2 ILO will > not run when placed behind a Cisco PIX firewall, even when the firewall > is permitting all ports & traffic in and out. Very strange and not > really what I was expecting. The X4100 ILO runs great, even using NAT > on that... > > > > mousehouse wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get >> Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot, >> etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct screen. But >> running the Remote Console application gives nothing (white screen). >> >> Tried Mozilla & Safari on Max OS.X and IE6 on Windows 2003. First ones >> gives white screen, second one ditto and hangs up the IE window. >> >> I see no traffic flowing but 2 TCP sessions open on ports 443 and 8600. >> Shouldn't there be more? |