I compiled an appilcation with gcc with both PA-RISC1.1 and 2.0 libs.
The executable compiled fine.
However when I am doing an shl_findsym() on 1.1 lib, there is Seg
Fault.

Am not quite sure how to determine if the system is PA-RISC1.1 or 2.0
Running HP-UX B.11.00
$ model
9000/800/L3000-5x

Thanks,
Harsha

harshanand.nayak@gmail.com wrote:
> I compiled an appilcation with gcc with both PA-RISC1.1 and 2.0 libs.
> The executable compiled fine.
> However when I am doing an shl_findsym() on 1.1 lib, there is Seg
> Fault.

Is the segfault actually in shl_findsym() or somewhere else? Got the
stack trace?

> Am not quite sure how to determine if the system is PA-RISC1.1 or 2.0
> Running HP-UX B.11.00
> $ model
> 9000/800/L3000-5x

There is probably some getconf() magic to tell you, but I can say from
my vast store of trivia that the CPUs in an L3000 are PA-2.0.
However, it should still be able to run a PA 1.1 code just fine.

With the exception of the A180, any PA-RISC system less then about 10
years old is PA-RISC2.0. PA-RISC 2.0 CPUs first appeared in systems
ca 1995.

rick jones
--
The computing industry isn't as much a game of "Follow The Leader" as
it is one of "Ring Around the Rosy" or perhaps "Duck Duck Goose."
- Rick Jones
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...