vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, I had a similar question some time ago (which remained unanswered): In my HP-UX software package I use os_release B.11.23|B.11.31 According to the documentation (man 4 sd) this is perfectly OK, but swinstall doesn't list the software package as installable. In a different package that can be installed I used os_release ?.11.[123]* As the documentation is so wrong, does anybody know whether I'll ahve to use "\|" instead of "|" (like in egrep) to make that work. A lot of documentation is rather worthless if it's wrong. Who can clarify? Regards, Ulrich |
| ||||
| Yesterday I did not write the truth: > Hi, > > I had a similar question some time ago (which remained unanswered): > In my HP-UX software package I use > os_release B.11.23|B.11.31 > According to the documentation (man 4 sd) this is perfectly OK, but swinstall > doesn't list the software package as installable. > > In a different package that can be installed I used > os_release ?.11.[123]* > > As the documentation is so wrong, does anybody know whether I'll have to use > "\|" instead of "|" (like in egrep) to make that work. > [...] That's not true: Both variants work. My mistake was that I had used a depot that still had the old versions of the products that doid not know about HP-UX 11.31. Sorry, Ulrich |