SEO

permalink · #1 (**permalink**) 01-16-2008, 06:31 PM

hi, my current environment with mscg. I have 2 nodes, one is
productive and the other is adoptive, with a one package concept.
Doesnt the profiles of the SAP instance tags along with the virtual
ip/hostnames instead of the physical ones?

permalink · #2 (**permalink**) 01-16-2008, 06:31 PM

yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote:

>hi, my current environment with mscg. I have 2 nodes, one is
>productive and the other is adoptive, with a one package concept.
>Doesnt the profiles of the SAP instance tags along with the virtual
>ip/hostnames instead of the physical ones?

You should use the package IP Address/Hostname rather than the node
address/name to access the application That way the clients/users will
always find the application, irrespective of which node it is running
on.

Reagrds,

Ted.
================================================== ============
| Ted Linnell <edlinnell@acslink.net.au> |
| |
| Nunawading, Victoria , Australia |
================================================== ============

permalink · #3 (**permalink**) 01-16-2008, 06:31 PM

Ted Linnell <edlinnell@acslink.net.au> wrote in message news:<pmc7m0ds7i7qahjgc7iov9indacn848phf@4ax.com>. ..
> yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote:
>
> >hi, my current environment with mscg. I have 2 nodes, one is
> >productive and the other is adoptive, with a one package concept.
> >Doesnt the profiles of the SAP instance tags along with the virtual
> >ip/hostnames instead of the physical ones?
>
> You should use the package IP Address/Hostname rather than the node
> address/name to access the application That way the clients/users will
> always find the application, irrespective of which node it is running
> on.
>
> Reagrds,
>
> Ted.
> ================================================== ============
> | Ted Linnell <edlinnell@acslink.net.au> |
> | |
> | Nunawading, Victoria , Australia |
> ================================================== ============

agreed... but the current setup uses the physical ip/hostname
instead.. will discuss with my team and management.

permalink · #4 (**permalink**) 01-16-2008, 06:32 PM

yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote in message news:<c06e4d68.0410060625.5223b2b9@posting.google. com>...
> Ted Linnell <edlinnell@acslink.net.au> wrote in message news:<pmc7m0ds7i7qahjgc7iov9indacn848phf@4ax.com>. ..
> > yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote:
> >
> > >hi, my current environment with mscg. I have 2 nodes, one is
> > >productive and the other is adoptive, with a one package concept.
> > >Doesnt the profiles of the SAP instance tags along with the virtual
> > >ip/hostnames instead of the physical ones?
> >
> > You should use the package IP Address/Hostname rather than the node
> > address/name to access the application That way the clients/users will
> > always find the application, irrespective of which node it is running
> > on.
> >
> > Reagrds,
> >
> > Ted.
> > ================================================== ============
> > | Ted Linnell <edlinnell@acslink.net.au> |
> > | |
> > | Nunawading, Victoria , Australia |
> > ================================================== ============
>
>
>
> agreed... but the current setup uses the physical ip/hostname
> instead.. will discuss with my team and management.

Current SAP profiles is profile_node1. When node1 is switched over to
node2, node1 will not be available anymore. Therefore, how the
profile_node1 is going to make sense. Instead of tagging the
profile_node1, it should be profile_virtualhostname as the previous
posting mentioned.

any advise?

permalink · #5 (**permalink**) 01-16-2008, 06:40 PM

Maybe explain your problem so that someone can understand it.

Ulrich

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

SEO

SAP instance profiles with what which hostnames/ip